Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ERASX vs PAMCX
ERASX vs PAMCX Comparison
Open Charts ERASX vs PAMCX
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap R6
Price$37.26
Change-$2.53 (-6.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.37B
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Adv
Price$90.88
Change-$5.74 (-5.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.1B
ERASX vs PAMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ERASX vs. PAMCX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ERASX is a Hold and PAMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAMCX has more cash in the bank: 25.1B vs. ERASX (11.4B). ERASX pays higher dividends than PAMCX: ERASX (0.13) vs PAMCX (0.00). ERASX was incepted earlier than PAMCX: ERASX (12 years) vs PAMCX (26 years). PAMCX (1.01) is less costly to investors than ERASX (0.81). PAMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.60 vs. ERASX (9.00). PAMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ERASX: PAMCX (2500) vs ERASX (5000000). PAMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.18 vs. ERASX (-11.77). ERASX return over 5 years is better than : 0.69 vs. PAMCX (-17.05).
| ERASX | PAMCX | ERASX / PAMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.01 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.01 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.529 | 0.989 | 155% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 2500 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.4B | 25.1B | 45% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.13 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.77 | -6.18 | 191% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.72 | -0.86 | -316% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.69 | -17.05 | -4% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.67 | 46.09 | 127% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers