Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ERASX vs PAMCX
ERASX vs PAMCX Comparison
Open Charts ERASX vs PAMCX
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap R6
Price$39.87
Change+$0.08 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.19B
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Adv
Price$97.57
Change+$0.86 (+0.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.6B
ERASX vs PAMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ERASX vs. PAMCX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ERASX is a StrongBuy and PAMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAMCX has more cash in the bank: 25.6B vs. ERASX (12.2B). ERASX pays higher dividends than PAMCX: ERASX (0.22) vs PAMCX (0.00). ERASX was incepted earlier than PAMCX: ERASX (11 years) vs PAMCX (26 years). PAMCX (1.01) is less costly to investors than ERASX (0.81). PAMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.60 vs. ERASX (9.00). PAMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ERASX: PAMCX (2500) vs ERASX (5000000). PAMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -10.85 vs. ERASX (-14.32). ERASX return over 5 years is better than : 7.90 vs. PAMCX (-12.01).
| ERASX | PAMCX | ERASX / PAMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.01 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 1.01 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.375 | 3.842 | -140% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 2500 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.2B | 25.6B | 48% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.22 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.32 | -10.85 | 132% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.36 | 6.48 | 6% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.90 | -12.01 | -66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.91 | 22.53 | 182% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers