Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ERASX vs FSMAX
ERASX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts ERASX vs FSMAX
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap R6
Price$42.81
Change-$0.35 (-0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.49B
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$96.51
Change+$0.65 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.17B
ERASX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ERASX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jul 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ERASX is a Buy and FSMAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 39.2B vs. ERASX (14.5B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than ERASX: FSMAX (0.47) vs ERASX (0.21). ERASX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: ERASX (11 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). ERASX (0.81) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). ERASX (9.00) and FSMAX (9.00) have comparable annual turnover. FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ERASX: FSMAX (0) vs ERASX (5000000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.33 vs. ERASX (3.13). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 61.91 vs. ERASX (24.72).
| ERASX | FSMAX | ERASX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.04 | 2,314% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.04 | 2,314% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.640 | 6.195 | 43% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.5B | 39.2B | 37% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.21 | 0.47 | 44% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.13 | 15.33 | 20% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.03 | 51.73 | 37% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.72 | 61.91 | 40% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.18 | 86.12 | 65% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers