Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ERASX vs FSMAX
ERASX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts ERASX vs FSMAX
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap R6
Price$39.94
Change+$0.42 (+1.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.99B
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$101.01
Change+$0.91 (+0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.05B
ERASX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ERASX vs. FSMAX commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ERASX is a Buy and FSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 41B vs. ERASX (14B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than ERASX: FSMAX (0.44) vs ERASX (0.21). ERASX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: ERASX (11 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). ERASX (0.81) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.00 vs. ERASX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ERASX: FSMAX (0) vs ERASX (5000000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.92 vs. ERASX (-10.38). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 63.96 vs. ERASX (16.90).
| ERASX | FSMAX | ERASX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.04 | 2,314% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.04 | 2,314% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.018 | 11.147 | -45% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14B | 41B | 34% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.21 | 0.44 | 47% |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.38 | 16.92 | -61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.90 | 71.41 | 25% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.90 | 63.96 | 26% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.52 | 118.30 | 49% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers