Intraday BUY SELL Signals
68 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EQWL vs GS
EQWL vs GS Comparison
Open Charts EQWL vs GS
Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF
Price$121.51
Change+$0.31 (+0.26%)
Volume$481
Net Assets2.22B
Goldman Sachs Group
Price$903.62
Change-$35.37 (-3.77%)
Volume$2.3K
Capitalization281.63B
EQWL vs GS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EQWL vs. GS commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EQWL is a StrongBuy and GS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GS: Fundamental Ratings
GS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 77 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 85 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 10 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 5 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 11 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EQWL | GS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 45% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 56% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 7 days ago 63% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 74% | 16 days ago 55% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
EQWL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EQWL has been closely correlated with MET. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EQWL jumps, then MET could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EQWL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EQWL | 100% | -0.34% | ||
| MET - EQWL | 81% Closely correlated | -2.98% | ||
| GS - EQWL | 81% Closely correlated | -0.78% | ||
| MS - EQWL | 79% Closely correlated | -1.18% | ||
| USB - EQWL | 78% Closely correlated | +2.32% | ||
| EMR - EQWL | 78% Closely correlated | +2.33% | ||
More | ||||
GS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GS has been closely correlated with MS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GS jumps, then MS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y