Intraday BUY SELL Signals
62 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EQWL vs GS
EQWL vs GS Comparison
Open Charts EQWL vs GS
Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF
Price$116.42
Change-$1.50 (-1.27%)
Volume$86.18K
Net Assets1.84B
Goldman Sachs Group
Price$805.50
Change-$33.47 (-3.99%)
Volume$2.56M
Capitalization241.59B
EQWL vs GS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EQWL vs. GS commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EQWL is a Buy and GS is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GS: Fundamental Ratings
GS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 6 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 32 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 9 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 5 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 19 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EQWL | GS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 44% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 64% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 73% | 7 days ago 55% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 43% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 49% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
EQWL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EQWL has been closely correlated with AXP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EQWL jumps, then AXP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EQWL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EQWL | 100% | +0.74% | ||
| AXP - EQWL | 83% Closely correlated | +0.71% | ||
| MET - EQWL | 81% Closely correlated | +3.11% | ||
| GS - EQWL | 80% Closely correlated | +3.54% | ||
| EMR - EQWL | 80% Closely correlated | +2.25% | ||
| USB - EQWL | 79% Closely correlated | +0.57% | ||
More | ||||
GS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GS has been closely correlated with MS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GS jumps, then MS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y