63 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...
EQWL vs GS
EQWL vs GS Comparison
Open Charts EQWL vs GS
Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF
Price$106.08
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$43.4K
CapitalizationN/A
Goldman Sachs Group
Price$594.22
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.76M
CapitalizationN/A
EQWL vs GS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EQWL vs. GS commentary
Nov 15, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EQWL is a Hold and GS is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GS: Fundamental Ratings
GS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 12 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 97 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 6 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 5 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 8 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 35 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EQWL | GS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 47% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 59% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 62% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 51% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
EQWL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EQWL has been closely correlated with BLK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EQWL jumps, then BLK could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EQWL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EQWL | 100% | +0.22% | ||
| BLK - EQWL | 74% Closely correlated | -0.52% | ||
| BAC - EQWL | 68% Closely correlated | +0.02% | ||
| GS - EQWL | 68% Closely correlated | +0.28% | ||
| HD - EQWL | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.76% | ||
| LOW - EQWL | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.90% | ||
More | ||||
GS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GS has been closely correlated with PIPR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GS jumps, then PIPR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y