EQTRF
Price
$0.08
Change
+$0.01 (+14.29%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
19.25M
FFMGF
Price
$0.13
Change
+$0.01 (+8.33%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
162.59M
Interact to see
Advertisement

EQTRF vs FFMGF

Header iconEQTRF vs FFMGF Comparison
Open Charts EQTRF vs FFMGFBanner chart's image
Altamira Gold
Price$0.08
Change+$0.01 (+14.29%)
Volume$33.5K
Capitalization19.25M
First Mining Gold
Price$0.13
Change+$0.01 (+8.33%)
Volume$434.42K
Capitalization162.59M
EQTRF vs FFMGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EQTRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FFMGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EQTRF vs. FFMGF commentary
Aug 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EQTRF is a Hold and FFMGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 12, 2025
Stock price -- (EQTRF: $0.08 vs. FFMGF: $0.13)
Brand notoriety: EQTRF and FFMGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EQTRF: 102% vs. FFMGF: 41%
Market capitalization -- EQTRF: $19.25M vs. FFMGF: $162.3M
EQTRF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $19.25M. FFMGF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $162.3M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $75.65B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EQTRF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFFMGF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EQTRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FFMGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FFMGF is a better buy in the long-term than EQTRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EQTRF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FFMGF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EQTRF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FFMGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EQTRF is a better buy in the short-term than FFMGF.

Price Growth

EQTRF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +6.22% price change this week, while FFMGF (@Precious Metals) price change was +6.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +19.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4669.68%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+19.67% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFMGF($163M) has a higher market cap than EQTRF($19.2M). FFMGF YTD gains are higher at: 52.449 vs. EQTRF (-8.889). EQTRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.07M vs. FFMGF (-7.17M). FFMGF has more cash in the bank: 11.7M vs. EQTRF (1.45M). EQTRF (0) and FFMGF (0) have equivalent revenues.
EQTRFFFMGFEQTRF / FFMGF
Capitalization19.2M163M12%
EBITDA-2.07M-7.17M29%
Gain YTD-8.88952.449-17%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash1.45M11.7M12%
Total DebtN/A212K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EQTRF vs FFMGF: Fundamental Ratings
EQTRF
FFMGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
37
Fair valued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
93100
SMR RATING
1..100
9493
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5146
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FFMGF's Valuation (33) in the null industry is in the same range as EQTRF (37). This means that FFMGF’s stock grew similarly to EQTRF’s over the last 12 months.

EQTRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as FFMGF (100). This means that EQTRF’s stock grew similarly to FFMGF’s over the last 12 months.

FFMGF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as EQTRF (94). This means that FFMGF’s stock grew similarly to EQTRF’s over the last 12 months.

FFMGF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as EQTRF (51). This means that FFMGF’s stock grew similarly to EQTRF’s over the last 12 months.

FFMGF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as EQTRF (100). This means that FFMGF’s stock grew similarly to EQTRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EQTRFFFMGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
76%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EQTRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FFMGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CPHRF11.371.57
+16.02%
Cipher Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
TKGSY18.020.30
+1.69%
Tokyo Gas Co., Ltd.
BRST0.02N/A
N/A
Broad Street Realty Inc.
TDBOY28.11N/A
N/A
Toyota Boshoku Corp.
CFPUF0.46-0.03
-5.35%
Canfor Pulp Products, Inc.

FFMGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FFMGF and BCEKF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FFMGF and BCEKF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFMGF
1D Price
Change %
FFMGF100%
+5.00%
BCEKF - FFMGF
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.27%
TORXF - FFMGF
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.19%
TDRRF - FFMGF
26%
Poorly correlated
+2.94%
ELEMF - FFMGF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.41%
ORZCF - FFMGF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.86%
More