EQTRF
Price
$0.11
Change
+$0.02 (+22.22%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
29.78M
EREPF
Price
$0.05
Change
+$0.02 (+66.67%)
Updated
Aug 25 closing price
Capitalization
4.7M
Interact to see
Advertisement

EQTRF vs EREPF

Header iconEQTRF vs EREPF Comparison
Open Charts EQTRF vs EREPFBanner chart's image
Altamira Gold
Price$0.11
Change+$0.02 (+22.22%)
Volume$349.52K
Capitalization29.78M
Zonte Metals
Price$0.05
Change+$0.02 (+66.67%)
Volume$3K
Capitalization4.7M
EQTRF vs EREPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EQTRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EREPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EQTRF vs. EREPF commentary
Sep 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EQTRF is a Hold and EREPF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 03, 2025
Stock price -- (EQTRF: $0.11 vs. EREPF: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: EQTRF and EREPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EQTRF: 559% vs. EREPF: 37%
Market capitalization -- EQTRF: $44.33M vs. EREPF: $4.12M
EQTRF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $44.33M. EREPF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $4.12M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $91.29B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.64B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EQTRF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileEREPF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EQTRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • EREPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both EQTRF and EREPF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EQTRF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EREPF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EQTRF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • EREPF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EQTRF is a better buy in the short-term than EREPF.

Price Growth

EQTRF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +41.42% price change this week, while EREPF (@Precious Metals) price change was +53.12% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +18.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3881.50%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.37% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EQTRF($29.8M) has a higher market cap than EREPF($4.7M). EQTRF YTD gains are higher at: 26.333 vs. EREPF (22.500). EREPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -470.83K vs. EQTRF (-1.43M). EQTRF has more cash in the bank: 309K vs. EREPF (238K). EQTRF (0) and EREPF (0) have equivalent revenues.
EQTRFEREPFEQTRF / EREPF
Capitalization29.8M4.7M635%
EBITDA-1.43M-470.83K304%
Gain YTD26.33322.500117%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash309K238K130%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EQTRF vs EREPF: Fundamental Ratings
EQTRF
EREPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
40
Fair valued
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
94100
SMR RATING
1..100
9495
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3739
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1006
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EQTRF's Valuation (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EREPF (92). This means that EQTRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than EREPF’s over the last 12 months.

EQTRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as EREPF (100). This means that EQTRF’s stock grew similarly to EREPF’s over the last 12 months.

EQTRF's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as EREPF (95). This means that EQTRF’s stock grew similarly to EREPF’s over the last 12 months.

EQTRF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as EREPF (39). This means that EQTRF’s stock grew similarly to EREPF’s over the last 12 months.

EREPF's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for EQTRF (100). This means that EREPF’s stock grew significantly faster than EQTRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EQTRFEREPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
82%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
88%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
38%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
37%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
75%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
84%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
38%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EQTRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
EREPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TC13.130.83
+6.73%
Token Cat Limited
SLRC16.620.09
+0.54%
SLR Investment Corp
IFS39.72-0.19
-0.48%
Intercorp Financial Services
VLN2.01-0.02
-0.99%
Valens Semiconductor Ltd
DDOG136.68-4.28
-3.04%
Datadog

EQTRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EQTRF and TGLDF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EQTRF and TGLDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EQTRF
1D Price
Change %
EQTRF100%
+23.19%
TGLDF - EQTRF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFMGF - EQTRF
9%
Poorly correlated
+2.64%
FMANF - EQTRF
1%
Poorly correlated
+2.89%
EREPF - EQTRF
-4%
Poorly correlated
N/A

EREPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EREPF has been loosely correlated with LVGLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EREPF jumps, then LVGLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EREPF
1D Price
Change %
EREPF100%
N/A
LVGLF - EREPF
35%
Loosely correlated
+4.55%
FFMGF - EREPF
13%
Poorly correlated
+2.64%
EQTRF - EREPF
-4%
Poorly correlated
+23.19%
FMANF - EREPF
-8%
Poorly correlated
+2.89%