EQS
Price
$1.41
Change
+$0.01 (+0.71%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
20.28M
VINP
Price
$9.77
Change
+$0.11 (+1.14%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
607.7M
31 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

EQS vs VINP

Header iconEQS vs VINP Comparison
Open Charts EQS vs VINPBanner chart's image
Equus Total Return
Price$1.41
Change+$0.01 (+0.71%)
Volume$8.79K
Capitalization20.28M
Vinci Partners Investments
Price$9.77
Change+$0.11 (+1.14%)
Volume$33.52K
Capitalization607.7M
EQS vs VINP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EQS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VINP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EQS vs. VINP commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EQS is a StrongBuy and VINP is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (EQS: $1.41 vs. VINP: $9.66)
Brand notoriety: EQS and VINP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EQS: 89% vs. VINP: 0%
Market capitalization -- EQS: $20.28M vs. VINP: $607.7M
EQS [@Investment Managers] is valued at $20.28M. VINP’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $607.7M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EQS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileVINP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • EQS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • VINP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, EQS is a better buy in the long-term than VINP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EQS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VINP’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EQS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • VINP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, VINP is a better buy in the short-term than EQS.

Price Growth

EQS (@Investment Managers) experienced а +2.17% price change this week, while VINP (@Investment Managers) price change was +0.94% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.30%.

Reported Earning Dates

VINP is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.13% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VINP($608M) has a higher market cap than EQS($20.3M). VINP has higher P/E ratio than EQS: VINP (13.92) vs EQS (1.85). EQS YTD gains are higher at: 28.182 vs. VINP (-1.029). VINP has higher revenues than EQS: VINP (608M) vs EQS (15.1M).
EQSVINPEQS / VINP
Capitalization20.3M608M3%
EBITDAN/A289M-
Gain YTD28.182-1.029-2,738%
P/E Ratio1.8513.9213%
Revenue15.1M608M2%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt18MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EQS: Fundamental Ratings
EQS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
43
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
89
SMR RATING
1..100
96
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
41
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EQSVINP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EQS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VINP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ASLDX134.671.32
+0.99%
American Century Select G
GGFRX14.780.12
+0.82%
Nationwide BNY Mellon Dyn US Core R
SGPSX81.330.58
+0.72%
ProFunds Small Cap Growth Svc
BRWIX42.140.15
+0.36%
AMG Boston Common Global Impact I
MSIBX19.670.03
+0.15%
Morgan Stanley Inst Passport ovrs eq A

EQS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EQS and RMGOF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EQS and RMGOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EQS
1D Price
Change %
EQS100%
+0.71%
RMGOF - EQS
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AB - EQS
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.34%
VINP - EQS
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.14%
FDUS - EQS
9%
Poorly correlated
+1.07%
ARCC - EQS
9%
Poorly correlated
+1.63%
More

VINP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VINP has been loosely correlated with PAX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VINP jumps, then PAX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VINP
1D Price
Change %
VINP100%
N/A
PAX - VINP
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.33%
SEIC - VINP
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.24%
BN - VINP
58%
Loosely correlated
+2.67%
APAM - VINP
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.02%
TROW - VINP
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.19%
More