Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EQNBX vs RMFCX
EQNBX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts EQNBX vs RMFCX
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.38
Change-$0.07 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.46B
EQNBX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EQNBX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EQNBX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. EQNBX (673M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than EQNBX: RMFCX (1.24) vs EQNBX (1.11). EQNBX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: EQNBX (13 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). EQNBX (1.70) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). EQNBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than EQNBX: RMFCX (250) vs EQNBX (1000). EQNBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.97 vs. RMFCX (8.71). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 56.72 vs. EQNBX (53.56).
| EQNBX | RMFCX | EQNBX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.91 | 180% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.70 | 0.91 | 187% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.795 | 11.292 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 673M | 109B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.11 | 1.24 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.97 | 8.71 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.48 | 28.01 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.56 | 56.72 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.79 | 92.34 | 108% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement