EQMEF
Price
$0.18
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
12.34M
USGDF
Price
$0.17
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
41.93M
Interact to see
Advertisement

EQMEF vs USGDF

Header iconEQMEF vs USGDF Comparison
Open Charts EQMEF vs USGDFBanner chart's image
Equity Metals
Price$0.18
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$59.71K
Capitalization12.34M
American Pacific Mining
Price$0.17
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$128.5K
Capitalization41.93M
EQMEF vs USGDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EQMEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
USGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EQMEF vs. USGDF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EQMEF is a Hold and USGDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (EQMEF: $0.18 vs. USGDF: $0.17)
Brand notoriety: EQMEF and USGDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EQMEF: 30% vs. USGDF: 55%
Market capitalization -- EQMEF: $12.34M vs. USGDF: $41.93M
EQMEF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $12.34M. USGDF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $41.93M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EQMEF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUSGDF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EQMEF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • USGDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, EQMEF is a better buy in the long-term than USGDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EQMEF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while USGDF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EQMEF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • USGDF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EQMEF is a better buy in the short-term than USGDF.

Price Growth

EQMEF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +12.68% price change this week, while USGDF (@Precious Metals) price change was -0.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.26%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.06% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
USGDF($41.9M) has a higher market cap than EQMEF($12.3M). EQMEF YTD gains are higher at: 45.065 vs. USGDF (19.286). EQMEF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.8M vs. USGDF (-8.82M). USGDF has more cash in the bank: 4.06M vs. EQMEF (2.79M). EQMEF (0) and USGDF (0) have equivalent revenues.
EQMEFUSGDFEQMEF / USGDF
Capitalization12.3M41.9M29%
EBITDA-1.8M-8.82M20%
Gain YTD45.06519.286234%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash2.79M4.06M69%
Total DebtN/A117K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EQMEF vs USGDF: Fundamental Ratings
EQMEF
USGDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
56100
SMR RATING
1..100
9984
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4143
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
17
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

USGDF's Valuation (67) in the null industry is in the same range as EQMEF (93). This means that USGDF’s stock grew similarly to EQMEF’s over the last 12 months.

EQMEF's Profit vs Risk Rating (56) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for USGDF (100). This means that EQMEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than USGDF’s over the last 12 months.

USGDF's SMR Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as EQMEF (99). This means that USGDF’s stock grew similarly to EQMEF’s over the last 12 months.

EQMEF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as USGDF (43). This means that EQMEF’s stock grew similarly to USGDF’s over the last 12 months.

EQMEF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as USGDF (7). This means that EQMEF’s stock grew similarly to USGDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EQMEFUSGDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EQMEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
USGDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SBMFF0.69N/A
N/A
Sino Biopharmaceutical Ltd.
SFRGF6.40N/A
N/A
Salvatore Ferragamo S.P.A.
BAUFF0.08N/A
N/A
Blue Star Gold Corp.
STRYF5.68N/A
N/A
Storytel AB
VMXXF0.08N/A
N/A
VALHALLA METALS INC.

EQMEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EQMEF has been loosely correlated with ISVLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EQMEF jumps, then ISVLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EQMEF
1D Price
Change %
EQMEF100%
-4.36%
ISVLF - EQMEF
36%
Loosely correlated
-4.54%
AYASF - EQMEF
34%
Loosely correlated
-5.62%
NEWP - EQMEF
30%
Poorly correlated
-2.94%
BTG - EQMEF
30%
Poorly correlated
-3.29%
IMPUY - EQMEF
29%
Poorly correlated
-5.47%
More

USGDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that USGDF and NSUPF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that USGDF and NSUPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To USGDF
1D Price
Change %
USGDF100%
-1.76%
NSUPF - USGDF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.15%
ISVLF - USGDF
23%
Poorly correlated
-4.54%
BCEKF - USGDF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.40%
EQMEF - USGDF
22%
Poorly correlated
-4.36%
BVN - USGDF
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.12%
More