EQMEF
Price
$0.17
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
12.34M
GSHRF
Price
$0.29
Change
+$0.01 (+3.57%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
20.85M
Interact to see
Advertisement

EQMEF vs GSHRF

Header iconEQMEF vs GSHRF Comparison
Open Charts EQMEF vs GSHRFBanner chart's image
Equity Metals
Price$0.17
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$23.73K
Capitalization12.34M
Goldshore Resources
Price$0.29
Change+$0.01 (+3.57%)
Volume$34.5K
Capitalization20.85M
EQMEF vs GSHRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EQMEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GSHRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EQMEF vs. GSHRF commentary
Jul 21, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EQMEF is a Hold and GSHRF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 21, 2025
Stock price -- (EQMEF: $0.17 vs. GSHRF: $0.29)
Brand notoriety: EQMEF and GSHRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EQMEF: 12% vs. GSHRF: 56%
Market capitalization -- EQMEF: $12.34M vs. GSHRF: $20.85M
EQMEF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $12.34M. GSHRF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $20.85M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EQMEF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGSHRF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EQMEF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GSHRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, EQMEF is a better buy in the long-term than GSHRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EQMEF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GSHRF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EQMEF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GSHRF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both EQMEF and GSHRF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

EQMEF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -7.89% price change this week, while GSHRF (@Precious Metals) price change was -2.78% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.23%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.51% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GSHRF($20.8M) has a higher market cap than EQMEF($12.3M). GSHRF YTD gains are higher at: 71.625 vs. EQMEF (44.652). EQMEF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.8M vs. GSHRF (-2.2M). GSHRF has more cash in the bank: 4M vs. EQMEF (2.79M). EQMEF (0) and GSHRF (0) have equivalent revenues.
EQMEFGSHRFEQMEF / GSHRF
Capitalization12.3M20.8M59%
EBITDA-1.8M-2.2M82%
Gain YTD44.65271.62562%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash2.79M4M70%
Total DebtN/A345K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EQMEF vs GSHRF: Fundamental Ratings
EQMEF
GSHRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6650
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
38
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5884
SMR RATING
1..100
9992
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4241
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GSHRF's Valuation (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EQMEF (93). This means that GSHRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than EQMEF’s over the last 12 months.

EQMEF's Profit vs Risk Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as GSHRF (84). This means that EQMEF’s stock grew similarly to GSHRF’s over the last 12 months.

GSHRF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as EQMEF (99). This means that GSHRF’s stock grew similarly to EQMEF’s over the last 12 months.

GSHRF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as EQMEF (42). This means that GSHRF’s stock grew similarly to EQMEF’s over the last 12 months.

EQMEF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GSHRF (100). This means that EQMEF’s stock grew significantly faster than GSHRF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EQMEFGSHRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EQMEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GSHRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CBGZF0.240.03
+15.38%
Cabral Gold Inc.
BNTGY12.850.07
+0.55%
Brenntag SE
BKQNY10.10N/A
N/A
Bank of Queensland Ltd.
CRBBF10.00N/A
N/A
Corby Spirit and Wine Ltd.
NBKCF18.00N/A
N/A
National Bank of Canada

EQMEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EQMEF has been loosely correlated with ISVLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EQMEF jumps, then ISVLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EQMEF
1D Price
Change %
EQMEF100%
+0.57%
ISVLF - EQMEF
36%
Loosely correlated
-7.95%
AYASF - EQMEF
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.84%
NEWP - EQMEF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BTG - EQMEF
30%
Poorly correlated
-3.48%
IMPUY - EQMEF
29%
Poorly correlated
+3.58%
More

GSHRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GSHRF and CHPGF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GSHRF and CHPGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GSHRF
1D Price
Change %
GSHRF100%
+1.52%
CHPGF - GSHRF
29%
Poorly correlated
-4.53%
LGDTF - GSHRF
28%
Poorly correlated
+2.98%
LOMLF - GSHRF
26%
Poorly correlated
+3.94%
GSVRF - GSHRF
24%
Poorly correlated
-3.94%
EQMEF - GSHRF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.57%
More