Advertisement
EQH vs WBIF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EQH is a Hold and WBIF is a Hold.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EQH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- EQH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
EQH | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 38 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 8 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 12 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| EQH | WBIF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 62% | 4 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 51% | 4 days ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% | 4 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 62% | 4 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 12 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 66% | 6 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% | 4 days ago 70% |
Advertisement
EQH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EQH has been loosely correlated with AIG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EQH jumps, then AIG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EQH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EQH | 100% | +0.61% | ||
| AIG - EQH | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.27% | ||
| ORI - EQH | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.16% | ||
| AEG - EQH | 48% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| AVVIY - EQH | 43% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| NNGRY - EQH | 39% Loosely correlated | +0.84% | ||
More | ||||
WBIF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WBIF has been closely correlated with PRI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WBIF jumps, then PRI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WBIF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WBIF | 100% | N/A | ||
| PRI - WBIF | 68% Closely correlated | +0.17% | ||
| EQH - WBIF | 68% Closely correlated | +0.61% | ||
| JHG - WBIF | 67% Closely correlated | -0.26% | ||
| SSNC - WBIF | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.18% | ||
| RPM - WBIF | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.15% | ||
More | ||||