Advertisement
EQH vs ULVM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EQH is a Buy and ULVM is a Buy.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EQH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- EQH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
EQH | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 39 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 6 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 12 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 26 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| EQH | ULVM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 55% | 4 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 4 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% | 4 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 69% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 66% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 66% | 4 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 65% | 4 days ago 79% |
Advertisement
EQH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EQH has been loosely correlated with AIG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EQH jumps, then AIG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EQH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EQH | 100% | -0.11% | ||
| AIG - EQH | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.45% | ||
| ORI - EQH | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.79% | ||
| AEG - EQH | 48% Loosely correlated | +3.13% | ||
| AVVIY - EQH | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.64% | ||
| NNGRY - EQH | 39% Loosely correlated | +0.58% | ||
More | ||||
ULVM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ULVM has been closely correlated with PNC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ULVM jumps, then PNC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ULVM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ULVM | 100% | +0.07% | ||
| PNC - ULVM | 77% Closely correlated | +0.13% | ||
| TFC - ULVM | 76% Closely correlated | +0.16% | ||
| GS - ULVM | 76% Closely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| FITB - ULVM | 75% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| EQH - ULVM | 74% Closely correlated | -0.11% | ||
More | ||||