EQH
Price
$53.01
Change
-$0.36 (-0.67%)
Updated
Sep 8, 12:50 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
15.99B
51 days until earnings call
STT
Price
$112.27
Change
-$0.68 (-0.60%)
Updated
Sep 8, 01:32 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
32.04B
43 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

EQH vs STT

Header iconEQH vs STT Comparison
Open Charts EQH vs STTBanner chart's image
Equitable Holdings
Price$53.01
Change-$0.36 (-0.67%)
Volume$1.1K
Capitalization15.99B
State Street
Price$112.27
Change-$0.68 (-0.60%)
Volume$500
Capitalization32.04B
EQH vs STT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EQH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EQH vs. STT commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EQH is a Hold and STT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (EQH: $53.37 vs. STT: $112.95)
Brand notoriety: EQH and STT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EQH: 140% vs. STT: 145%
Market capitalization -- EQH: $15.99B vs. STT: $32.04B
EQH [@Investment Managers] is valued at $15.99B. STT’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $32.04B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EQH’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileSTT’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • EQH’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • STT’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, EQH is a better buy in the long-term than STT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EQH’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STT’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EQH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • STT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EQH is a better buy in the short-term than STT.

Price Growth

EQH (@Investment Managers) experienced а +0.21% price change this week, while STT (@Investment Managers) price change was -1.76% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was +44.77%.

Reported Earning Dates

EQH is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

STT is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.31% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
STT($32B) has a higher market cap than EQH($16B). EQH has higher P/E ratio than STT: EQH (41.37) vs STT (12.69). STT YTD gains are higher at: 17.812 vs. EQH (14.867). EQH has less debt than STT: EQH (6.8B) vs STT (35.8B).
EQHSTTEQH / STT
Capitalization16B32B50%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD14.86717.81283%
P/E Ratio41.3712.69326%
RevenueN/A13.3B-
Total CashN/A4.66B-
Total Debt6.8B35.8B19%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EQH vs STT: Fundamental Ratings
EQH
STT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1033
SMR RATING
1..100
19
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5119
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
777
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EQH's Valuation (25) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as STT (25) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that EQH’s stock grew similarly to STT’s over the last 12 months.

EQH's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as STT (33) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that EQH’s stock grew similarly to STT’s over the last 12 months.

EQH's SMR Rating (1) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as STT (9) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that EQH’s stock grew similarly to STT’s over the last 12 months.

STT's Price Growth Rating (19) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as EQH (51) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that STT’s stock grew similarly to EQH’s over the last 12 months.

EQH's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is significantly better than the same rating for STT (77) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that EQH’s stock grew significantly faster than STT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EQHSTT
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EQH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ASHS35.141.23
+3.64%
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 CHN A SmCp ETF
PSLV13.860.12
+0.87%
Sprott Physical Silver Trust
FNGO118.410.67
+0.57%
MicroSectors™ FANG+™ 2X Leveraged ETN
QMMY24.13N/A
+0.01%
FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Mod Buffr ETF - May
BMAY43.38-0.02
-0.05%
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF™- May

EQH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EQH has been closely correlated with CRBG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EQH jumps, then CRBG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EQH
1D Price
Change %
EQH100%
-1.29%
CRBG - EQH
85%
Closely correlated
+0.18%
AMP - EQH
82%
Closely correlated
-4.42%
JHG - EQH
80%
Closely correlated
-1.82%
CG - EQH
79%
Closely correlated
-1.82%
PFG - EQH
79%
Closely correlated
-1.62%
More

STT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STT has been closely correlated with NTRS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if STT jumps, then NTRS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STT
1D Price
Change %
STT100%
-0.97%
NTRS - STT
80%
Closely correlated
-1.10%
BLK - STT
79%
Closely correlated
-0.40%
AMP - STT
76%
Closely correlated
-4.42%
JHG - STT
76%
Closely correlated
-1.82%
CRBG - STT
75%
Closely correlated
+0.18%
More