EQH
Price
$51.69
Change
+$0.15 (+0.29%)
Updated
Jan 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
12.53B
19 days until earnings call
SLF
Price
$58.88
Change
-$0.18 (-0.30%)
Updated
Jan 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
31.65B
26 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

EQH vs SLF

Header iconEQH vs SLF Comparison
Open Charts EQH vs SLFBanner chart's image
Equitable Holdings
Price$51.69
Change+$0.15 (+0.29%)
Volume$17.25K
Capitalization12.53B
Sun Life Financial
Price$58.88
Change-$0.18 (-0.30%)
Volume$1.3K
Capitalization31.65B
EQH vs SLF Comparison Chart
Loading...
EQH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EQH vs. SLF commentary
Jan 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EQH is a Hold and SLF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 18, 2025
Stock price -- (EQH: $51.54 vs. SLF: $59.06)
Brand notoriety: EQH and SLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Multi-Line Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EQH: 126% vs. SLF: 51%
Market capitalization -- EQH: $12.53B vs. SLF: $31.65B
EQH [@Multi-Line Insurance] is valued at $12.53B. SLF’s [@Multi-Line Insurance] market capitalization is $31.65B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry ranges from $634.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry is $21.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EQH’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EQH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, EQH is a better buy in the long-term than SLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EQH’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EQH’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EQH is a better buy in the short-term than SLF.

Price Growth

EQH (@Multi-Line Insurance) experienced а +5.16% price change this week, while SLF (@Multi-Line Insurance) price change was +0.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Multi-Line Insurance industry was +2.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.23%.

Reported Earning Dates

EQH is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.

SLF is expected to report earnings on May 08, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Multi-Line Insurance (+2.42% weekly)

A multi-line insurance contract bundles together exposures to risk and covers them under a single contract. For providers of such policies, the bundle is a potential risk diversification strategy since their exposure gets spread over several factors, which helps them mitigate a financial burden if a catastrophic event were to occur. Other potential benefits include getting more premiums from including more than one type of insurance in a bundle, and getting a competitive edge by procuring multiple insurance contracts with a customer. Examples of companies in this industry are Berkshire Hathaway (which owns several insurance companies), Chubb Limited, American International Group, Inc. and Sun Life Financial Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLF($31.6B) has a higher market cap than EQH($12.5B). SLF has higher P/E ratio than EQH: SLF (13.86) vs EQH (10.76). EQH YTD gains are higher at: 9.264 vs. SLF (-0.472). EQH has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. SLF (27.5B). EQH has less debt than SLF: EQH (5.63B) vs SLF (13.3B). SLF has higher revenues than EQH: SLF (32.7B) vs EQH (10.5B).
EQHSLFEQH / SLF
Capitalization12.5B31.6B40%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD9.264-0.472-1,963%
P/E Ratio10.7613.8678%
Revenue10.5B32.7B32%
Total Cash75.3B27.5B274%
Total Debt5.63B13.3B42%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EQH vs SLF: Fundamental Ratings
EQH
SLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2159
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1352
SMR RATING
1..100
9898
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3947
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
451
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
2950

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SLF's Valuation (31) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EQH (89). This means that SLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than EQH’s over the last 12 months.

EQH's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SLF (52). This means that EQH’s stock grew somewhat faster than SLF’s over the last 12 months.

EQH's SMR Rating (98) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as SLF (98). This means that EQH’s stock grew similarly to SLF’s over the last 12 months.

EQH's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as SLF (47). This means that EQH’s stock grew similarly to SLF’s over the last 12 months.

EQH's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SLF (51). This means that EQH’s stock grew somewhat faster than SLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EQHSLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
50%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
38%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
EQH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPY591.64-1.14
-0.19%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X99756.910000-747.585940
-0.74%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME27.72-0.24
-0.86%
GameStop Corp
TSLA413.82-14.40
-3.36%
Tesla
AAPL228.26-9.61
-4.04%
Apple

EQH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EQH has been loosely correlated with AIG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EQH jumps, then AIG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EQH
1D Price
Change %
EQH100%
-0.04%
AIG - EQH
54%
Loosely correlated
+2.11%
AEG - EQH
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.96%
ORI - EQH
46%
Loosely correlated
+2.59%
AVVIY - EQH
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.08%
NNGRY - EQH
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.43%
More

SLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLF has been loosely correlated with AIG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SLF jumps, then AIG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLF
1D Price
Change %
SLF100%
+0.19%
AIG - SLF
34%
Loosely correlated
+2.11%
EQH - SLF
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.04%
AEG - SLF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.96%
AVVIY - SLF
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.08%
ORI - SLF
26%
Poorly correlated
+2.59%
More