EQH
Price
$44.68
Change
-$5.22 (-10.46%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
12.8B
Earnings call today
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RJF
Price
$166.20
Change
+$2.05 (+1.25%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
32.74B
77 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EQH vs RJF

Header iconEQH vs RJF Comparison
Open Charts EQH vs RJFBanner chart's image
Equitable Holdings
Price$44.68
Change-$5.22 (-10.46%)
Volume$3.07M
Capitalization12.8B
Raymond James Financial
Price$166.20
Change+$2.05 (+1.25%)
Volume$1.35M
Capitalization32.74B
EQH vs RJF Comparison Chart in %
EQH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RJF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EQH vs. RJF commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EQH is a Hold and RJF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (EQH: $44.68 vs. RJF: $166.20)
Brand notoriety: EQH and RJF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EQH: 121% vs. RJF: 106%
Market capitalization -- EQH: $12.8B vs. RJF: $32.74B
EQH [@Investment Managers] is valued at $12.8B. RJF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $32.74B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $165.97B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.2B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EQH’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileRJF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • EQH’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • RJF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, EQH is a better buy in the long-term than RJF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EQH’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RJF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EQH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • RJF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RJF is a better buy in the short-term than EQH.

Price Growth

EQH (@Investment Managers) experienced а -2.72% price change this week, while RJF (@Investment Managers) price change was -1.67% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.96%.

Reported Earning Dates

EQH is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2026.

RJF is expected to report earnings on Apr 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-2.42% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RJF($32.7B) has a higher market cap than EQH($12.8B). EQH has higher P/E ratio than RJF: EQH (37.88) vs RJF (16.25). RJF YTD gains are higher at: 3.843 vs. EQH (-6.233). EQH has more cash in the bank: 42.9B vs. RJF (2.61B). RJF has less debt than EQH: RJF (4.22B) vs EQH (6.36B). RJF has higher revenues than EQH: RJF (13.8B) vs EQH (12B).
EQHRJFEQH / RJF
Capitalization12.8B32.7B39%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-6.2333.843-162%
P/E Ratio37.8816.25233%
Revenue12B13.8B87%
Total Cash42.9B2.61B1,641%
Total Debt6.36B4.22B151%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EQH vs RJF: Fundamental Ratings
EQH
RJF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7368
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3222
SMR RATING
1..100
10010
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7534
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
952
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5575

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EQH's Valuation (21) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RJF (77) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that EQH’s stock grew somewhat faster than RJF’s over the last 12 months.

RJF's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as EQH (32) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that RJF’s stock grew similarly to EQH’s over the last 12 months.

RJF's SMR Rating (10) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is significantly better than the same rating for EQH (100) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that RJF’s stock grew significantly faster than EQH’s over the last 12 months.

RJF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EQH (75) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that RJF’s stock grew somewhat faster than EQH’s over the last 12 months.

EQH's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RJF (52) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that EQH’s stock grew somewhat faster than RJF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EQHRJF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EQH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RJF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FTXN31.580.92
+3.01%
First Trust Nasdaq Oil & Gas ETF
FIVA36.950.21
+0.57%
Fidelity International Value Factor ETF
GVI107.030.01
+0.01%
iShares Intermediate Govt/Crdt Bd ETF
TGLB26.19-0.03
-0.13%
T. Rowe Price Global Equity ETF
MOTO57.09-0.88
-1.52%
Guinness Atkinson Smart Trans & Tch ETF

EQH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EQH has been closely correlated with CRBG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EQH jumps, then CRBG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EQH
1D Price
Change %
EQH100%
-4.43%
CRBG - EQH
85%
Closely correlated
-3.34%
CG - EQH
80%
Closely correlated
-3.46%
PFG - EQH
78%
Closely correlated
-0.74%
KKR - EQH
77%
Closely correlated
-9.69%
RJF - EQH
76%
Closely correlated
-0.68%
More

RJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RJF has been closely correlated with SF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RJF jumps, then SF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RJF
1D Price
Change %
RJF100%
-0.68%
SF - RJF
87%
Closely correlated
+0.08%
MS - RJF
82%
Closely correlated
-1.18%
EVR - RJF
80%
Closely correlated
-4.50%
GS - RJF
80%
Closely correlated
-0.78%
AMP - RJF
79%
Closely correlated
-0.40%
More