EQH
Price
$48.58
Change
-$0.16 (-0.33%)
Updated
Dec 26 closing price
Capitalization
13.92B
45 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FGNXP
Price
$21.50
Change
+$0.28 (+1.32%)
Updated
Dec 26 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EQH vs FGNXP

Header iconEQH vs FGNXP Comparison
Open Charts EQH vs FGNXPBanner chart's image
Equitable Holdings
Price$48.58
Change-$0.16 (-0.33%)
Volume$852.55K
Capitalization13.92B
Fundamental Global
Price$21.50
Change+$0.28 (+1.32%)
Volume$262
CapitalizationN/A
EQH vs FGNXP Comparison Chart in %
EQH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FGNXP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EQH vs. FGNXP commentary
Dec 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EQH is a Buy and FGNXP is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 28, 2025
Stock price -- (EQH: $48.58 vs. FGNXP: $21.50)
Brand notoriety: EQH and FGNXP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EQH: 31% vs. FGNXP: 9%
Market capitalization -- EQH: $13.92B vs. FGNXP: $0
EQH [@Investment Managers] is valued at $13.92B. FGNXP’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $168.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.54B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EQH’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileFGNXP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EQH’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • FGNXP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, EQH is a better buy in the long-term than FGNXP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EQH’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FGNXP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EQH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FGNXP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FGNXP is a better buy in the short-term than EQH.

Price Growth

EQH (@Investment Managers) experienced а +1.17% price change this week, while FGNXP (@Investment Managers) price change was +2.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.03%.

Reported Earning Dates

EQH is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.91% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGNXP YTD gains are higher at: 42.653 vs. EQH (4.558). EQH has more cash in the bank: 42.9B vs. FGNXP (7.5M). FGNXP has less debt than EQH: FGNXP (1.92M) vs EQH (6.36B). EQH has higher revenues than FGNXP: EQH (12B) vs FGNXP (18.1M).
EQHFGNXPEQH / FGNXP
Capitalization13.9BN/A-
EBITDAN/A-27.49M-
Gain YTD4.55842.65311%
P/E Ratio37.88N/A-
Revenue12B18.1M66,298%
Total Cash42.9B7.5M572,382%
Total Debt6.36B1.92M331,752%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EQH vs FGNXP: Fundamental Ratings
EQH
FGNXP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3633
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
5
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
22100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6042
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
507

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FGNXP's Valuation (5) in the null industry is in the same range as EQH (25) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that FGNXP’s stock grew similarly to EQH’s over the last 12 months.

EQH's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is significantly better than the same rating for FGNXP (100) in the null industry. This means that EQH’s stock grew significantly faster than FGNXP’s over the last 12 months.

EQH's SMR Rating (100) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as FGNXP (100) in the null industry. This means that EQH’s stock grew similarly to FGNXP’s over the last 12 months.

FGNXP's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as EQH (60) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that FGNXP’s stock grew similarly to EQH’s over the last 12 months.

EQH's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is significantly better than the same rating for FGNXP (100) in the null industry. This means that EQH’s stock grew significantly faster than FGNXP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EQHFGNXP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EQH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FGNXP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ACGLO20.230.06
+0.30%
Arch Capital Group Ltd
AFG138.160.07
+0.05%
American Financial Group
KIDS17.34-0.07
-0.40%
OrthoPediatrics Corp
TPB106.32-1.26
-1.17%
Turning Point Brands
THCH2.19-0.06
-2.67%
TH International Ltd

EQH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EQH has been closely correlated with CRBG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EQH jumps, then CRBG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EQH
1D Price
Change %
EQH100%
-0.33%
CRBG - EQH
82%
Closely correlated
-0.23%
PFG - EQH
79%
Closely correlated
-0.23%
KKR - EQH
76%
Closely correlated
-0.28%
AMP - EQH
75%
Closely correlated
+0.17%
CG - EQH
73%
Closely correlated
+0.16%
More

FGNXP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FGNXP and OXLCP have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FGNXP and OXLCP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FGNXP
1D Price
Change %
FGNXP100%
+1.32%
OXLCP - FGNXP
12%
Poorly correlated
-0.01%
LIEN - FGNXP
11%
Poorly correlated
+1.24%
ORI - FGNXP
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
EQH - FGNXP
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.33%
NTRSO - FGNXP
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More