EQGPF
Price
$70.54
Change
+$0.64 (+0.92%)
Updated
Dec 9 closing price
Capitalization
2.68B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
KPCUF
Price
Loading...
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Loading...
Capitalization
14.36B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EQGPF vs KPCUF

Header iconEQGPF vs KPCUF Comparison
Open Charts EQGPF vs KPCUFBanner chart's image
EQB
Price$70.54
Change+$0.64 (+0.92%)
Volume$11.41K
Capitalization2.68B
KASIKORNBANK Public
PriceLoading...
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization14.36B
EQGPF vs KPCUF Comparison Chart in %
EQGPF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EQGPF vs. KPCUF commentary
Dec 13, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EQGPF is a StrongBuy and KPCUF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 13, 2025
Stock price -- (EQGPF: $70.54 vs. KPCUF: $4.76)
Brand notoriety: EQGPF and KPCUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EQGPF: 65% vs. KPCUF: 100%
Market capitalization -- EQGPF: $2.68B vs. KPCUF: $14.36B
EQGPF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.68B. KPCUF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $14.36B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.36B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.41B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EQGPF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileKPCUF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • EQGPF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • KPCUF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, KPCUF is a better buy in the long-term than EQGPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EQGPF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • EQGPF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

EQGPF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.23% price change this week, while KPCUF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.52%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.05% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KPCUF($14.4B) has a higher market cap than EQGPF($2.68B). EQGPF has higher P/E ratio than KPCUF: EQGPF (14.63) vs KPCUF (7.59). KPCUF YTD gains are higher at: 34.077 vs. EQGPF (2.232). EQGPF has less debt than KPCUF: EQGPF (18.7B) vs KPCUF (194B). KPCUF has higher revenues than EQGPF: KPCUF (207B) vs EQGPF (1.26B).
EQGPFKPCUFEQGPF / KPCUF
Capitalization2.68B14.4B19%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD2.23234.0777%
P/E Ratio14.637.59193%
Revenue1.26B207B1%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt18.7B194B10%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EQGPF vs KPCUF: Fundamental Ratings
EQGPF
KPCUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3040
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7045
SMR RATING
1..100
121
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4951
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1547
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4365

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KPCUF's Valuation (20) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EQGPF (57). This means that KPCUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than EQGPF’s over the last 12 months.

KPCUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as EQGPF (70). This means that KPCUF’s stock grew similarly to EQGPF’s over the last 12 months.

KPCUF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as EQGPF (12). This means that KPCUF’s stock grew similarly to EQGPF’s over the last 12 months.

EQGPF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as KPCUF (51). This means that EQGPF’s stock grew similarly to KPCUF’s over the last 12 months.

EQGPF's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is in the same range as KPCUF (47). This means that EQGPF’s stock grew similarly to KPCUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EQGPFKPCUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
12%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
12%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
47%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EQGPF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NBHAX15.650.13
+0.84%
Neuberger Berman Equity Income A
MSGGX13.590.11
+0.82%
Meridian Small Cap Growth Legacy
SBHAX16.570.12
+0.73%
Segall Bryant & Hamill All Cap Instl
JGRCX111.400.78
+0.71%
Janus Henderson Enterprise C
JIJIX16.30-0.05
-0.31%
JHancock International Dynamic Gr I

EQGPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EQGPF and KPCUF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EQGPF and KPCUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EQGPF
1D Price
Change %
EQGPF100%
N/A
KPCUF - EQGPF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CEFC - EQGPF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NRDBY - EQGPF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.48%
MCBK - EQGPF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.08%
PBNK - EQGPF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

KPCUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KPCUF and FFWC have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KPCUF and FFWC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KPCUF
1D Price
Change %
KPCUF100%
N/A
FFWC - KPCUF
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EQGPF - KPCUF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FSDK - KPCUF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHBAF - KPCUF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PFSB - KPCUF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.70%
More