EQFN
Price
$13.03
Change
+$0.23 (+1.80%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
31.19M
LOB
Price
$32.27
Change
+$0.54 (+1.70%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.86B
16 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

EQFN vs LOB

Header iconEQFN vs LOB Comparison
Open Charts EQFN vs LOBBanner chart's image
Equitable Financial
Price$13.03
Change+$0.23 (+1.80%)
Volume$900
Capitalization31.19M
Live Oak Bancshares
Price$32.27
Change+$0.54 (+1.70%)
Volume$119.7K
Capitalization1.86B
EQFN vs LOB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EQFN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LOB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EQFN vs. LOB commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EQFN is a Buy and LOB is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (EQFN: $13.03 vs. LOB: $32.27)
Brand notoriety: EQFN and LOB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EQFN: 62% vs. LOB: 49%
Market capitalization -- EQFN: $31.19M vs. LOB: $1.86B
EQFN [@Regional Banks] is valued at $31.19M. LOB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.86B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EQFN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLOB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • EQFN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LOB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, EQFN is a better buy in the long-term than LOB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EQFN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LOB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EQFN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • LOB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EQFN is a better buy in the short-term than LOB.

Price Growth

EQFN (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.82% price change this week, while LOB (@Regional Banks) price change was +8.14% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.74%.

Reported Earning Dates

LOB is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.15% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LOB($1.86B) has a higher market cap than EQFN($31.2M). LOB has higher P/E ratio than EQFN: LOB (24.73) vs EQFN (6.94). EQFN YTD gains are higher at: 2.216 vs. LOB (-18.241). EQFN has less debt than LOB: EQFN (12.6M) vs LOB (23.4M). LOB has higher revenues than EQFN: LOB (434M) vs EQFN (19.3M).
EQFNLOBEQFN / LOB
Capitalization31.2M1.86B2%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD2.216-18.241-12%
P/E Ratio6.9424.7328%
Revenue19.3M434M4%
Total CashN/A535M-
Total Debt12.6M23.4M54%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EQFN vs LOB: Fundamental Ratings
EQFN
LOB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
85
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2281
SMR RATING
1..100
6115
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5447
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4614
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EQFN's Valuation (25) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LOB (85). This means that EQFN’s stock grew somewhat faster than LOB’s over the last 12 months.

EQFN's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LOB (81). This means that EQFN’s stock grew somewhat faster than LOB’s over the last 12 months.

LOB's SMR Rating (15) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EQFN (61). This means that LOB’s stock grew somewhat faster than EQFN’s over the last 12 months.

LOB's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as EQFN (54). This means that LOB’s stock grew similarly to EQFN’s over the last 12 months.

LOB's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as EQFN (46). This means that LOB’s stock grew similarly to EQFN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EQFNLOB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
10%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
6%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
16%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
10%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
17%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
17%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
4%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EQFN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LOB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EVTZF9.250.21
+2.32%
Evertz Technologies Ltd.
NIDB17.31N/A
N/A
Northeast Indiana Bancorp, Inc.
VGMIF0.02N/A
N/A
Visible Gold Mines, Inc.
VOYJF27.07N/A
N/A
Valmet OYJ
EVGGF81.73-0.54
-0.65%
Evolution AB

EQFN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EQFN has been loosely correlated with SFGIF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EQFN jumps, then SFGIF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EQFN
1D Price
Change %
EQFN100%
N/A
SFGIF - EQFN
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FCPB - EQFN
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FNWB - EQFN
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.12%
LOB - EQFN
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.70%
FRBA - EQFN
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.24%
More

LOB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LOB has been closely correlated with CATY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LOB jumps, then CATY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LOB
1D Price
Change %
LOB100%
+1.70%
CATY - LOB
82%
Closely correlated
N/A
FFIN - LOB
81%
Closely correlated
+0.53%
HOPE - LOB
80%
Closely correlated
+1.09%
BHLB - LOB
80%
Closely correlated
+2.04%
UCB - LOB
80%
Closely correlated
+1.24%
More