EQFN
Price
$13.06
Change
+$0.08 (+0.62%)
Updated
Feb 20 closing price
Capitalization
31.19M
LOB
Price
$31.99
Change
-$0.87 (-2.65%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
1.86B
59 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

EQFN vs LOB

Header iconEQFN vs LOB Comparison
Open Charts EQFN vs LOBBanner chart's image
Equitable Financial
Price$13.06
Change+$0.08 (+0.62%)
Volume$100
Capitalization31.19M
Live Oak Bancshares
Price$31.99
Change-$0.87 (-2.65%)
Volume$197.69K
Capitalization1.86B
EQFN vs LOB Comparison Chart
Loading...
LOB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EQFN vs. LOB commentary
Feb 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EQFN is a Hold and LOB is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 24, 2025
Stock price -- (EQFN: $13.06 vs. LOB: $31.99)
Brand notoriety: EQFN and LOB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EQFN: 6% vs. LOB: 100%
Market capitalization -- EQFN: $31.19M vs. LOB: $1.86B
EQFN [@Regional Banks] is valued at $31.19M. LOB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.86B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EQFN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLOB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EQFN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LOB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, EQFN is a better buy in the long-term than LOB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

LOB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • LOB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

EQFN (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.52% price change this week, while LOB (@Regional Banks) price change was -5.72% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

LOB is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.87% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LOB($1.86B) has a higher market cap than EQFN($31.2M). LOB has higher P/E ratio than EQFN: LOB (24.73) vs EQFN (6.94). EQFN YTD gains are higher at: 2.431 vs. LOB (-19.115). EQFN has less debt than LOB: EQFN (12.6M) vs LOB (23.4M). LOB has higher revenues than EQFN: LOB (434M) vs EQFN (19.3M).
EQFNLOBEQFN / LOB
Capitalization31.2M1.86B2%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD2.431-19.115-13%
P/E Ratio6.9424.7328%
Revenue19.3M434M4%
Total CashN/A535M-
Total Debt12.6M23.4M54%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EQFN vs LOB: Fundamental Ratings
EQFN
LOB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9064
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
77
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8477
SMR RATING
1..100
6214
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5486
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5676
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EQFN's Valuation (17) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LOB (77). This means that EQFN’s stock grew somewhat faster than LOB’s over the last 12 months.

LOB's Profit vs Risk Rating (77) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as EQFN (84). This means that LOB’s stock grew similarly to EQFN’s over the last 12 months.

LOB's SMR Rating (14) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EQFN (62). This means that LOB’s stock grew somewhat faster than EQFN’s over the last 12 months.

EQFN's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as LOB (86). This means that EQFN’s stock grew similarly to LOB’s over the last 12 months.

EQFN's P/E Growth Rating (56) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as LOB (76). This means that EQFN’s stock grew similarly to LOB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
LOB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 27 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
LOB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL245.55-0.28
-0.11%
Apple
BTC.X96258.000000-319.757800
-0.33%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY599.94-10.44
-1.71%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME26.42-0.62
-2.29%
GameStop Corp
TSLA337.80-16.60
-4.68%
Tesla

EQFN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EQFN has been loosely correlated with SFGIF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EQFN jumps, then SFGIF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EQFN
1D Price
Change %
EQFN100%
N/A
SFGIF - EQFN
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CSKL - EQFN
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FCPB - EQFN
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FNWB - EQFN
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.01%
LOB - EQFN
3%
Poorly correlated
-2.65%
More

LOB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LOB has been closely correlated with AUB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LOB jumps, then AUB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LOB
1D Price
Change %
LOB100%
-2.65%
AUB - LOB
77%
Closely correlated
-4.08%
UBSI - LOB
77%
Closely correlated
-3.37%
CATY - LOB
77%
Closely correlated
-1.38%
BOKF - LOB
77%
Closely correlated
-1.05%
FBNC - LOB
77%
Closely correlated
-1.77%
More