EQFN
Price
$13.05
Change
+$0.06 (+0.46%)
Updated
Jul 14 closing price
Capitalization
31.19M
FRBA
Price
$15.13
Change
+$0.03 (+0.20%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
330.07M
93 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

EQFN vs FRBA

Header iconEQFN vs FRBA Comparison
Open Charts EQFN vs FRBABanner chart's image
Equitable Financial
Price$13.05
Change+$0.06 (+0.46%)
Volume$1.62K
Capitalization31.19M
First Bank
Price$15.13
Change+$0.03 (+0.20%)
Volume$40.73K
Capitalization330.07M
EQFN vs FRBA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EQFN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FRBA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EQFN vs. FRBA commentary
Jul 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EQFN is a Buy and FRBA is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 28, 2025
Stock price -- (EQFN: $13.05 vs. FRBA: $15.13)
Brand notoriety: EQFN and FRBA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EQFN: 93% vs. FRBA: 89%
Market capitalization -- EQFN: $31.19M vs. FRBA: $330.07M
EQFN [@Regional Banks] is valued at $31.19M. FRBA’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $330.07M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EQFN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFRBA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EQFN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FRBA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, EQFN is a better buy in the long-term than FRBA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EQFN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FRBA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EQFN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FRBA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EQFN is a better buy in the short-term than FRBA.

Price Growth

EQFN (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FRBA (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.64% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

FRBA is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.51% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRBA($330M) has a higher market cap than EQFN($31.2M). FRBA has higher P/E ratio than EQFN: FRBA (13.84) vs EQFN (6.94). FRBA YTD gains are higher at: 8.384 vs. EQFN (2.353). EQFN has less debt than FRBA: EQFN (12.6M) vs FRBA (234M). FRBA has higher revenues than EQFN: FRBA (104M) vs EQFN (19.3M).
EQFNFRBAEQFN / FRBA
Capitalization31.2M330M9%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD2.3538.38428%
P/E Ratio6.9413.8450%
Revenue19.3M104M19%
Total CashN/A23.4M-
Total Debt12.6M234M5%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EQFN vs FRBA: Fundamental Ratings
EQFN
FRBA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5071
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
23
Undervalued
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2436
SMR RATING
1..100
6228
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5454
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4987
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3926

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EQFN's Valuation (23) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FRBA (36). This means that EQFN’s stock grew similarly to FRBA’s over the last 12 months.

EQFN's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FRBA (36). This means that EQFN’s stock grew similarly to FRBA’s over the last 12 months.

FRBA's SMR Rating (28) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EQFN (62). This means that FRBA’s stock grew somewhat faster than EQFN’s over the last 12 months.

FRBA's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as EQFN (54). This means that FRBA’s stock grew similarly to EQFN’s over the last 12 months.

EQFN's P/E Growth Rating (49) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRBA (87). This means that EQFN’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRBA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EQFNFRBA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
13%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
11%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
19%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
8%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
16%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
16%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
7%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
19%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EQFN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FRBA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ADTTF75.301.14
+1.54%
Advantest Corp.
CMGGF1.47N/A
N/A
Commercial International Bank Ltd.
MBKL21.51-0.37
-1.69%
MBT Bancshares, Inc.
ARGTF18.82-0.49
-2.51%
Artemis Gold Inc.
BDRL0.03-0.01
-31.44%
Blonder Tongue Laboratories, Inc.

EQFN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EQFN has been loosely correlated with SFGIF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EQFN jumps, then SFGIF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EQFN
1D Price
Change %
EQFN100%
N/A
SFGIF - EQFN
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FCPB - EQFN
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.09%
FNWB - EQFN
3%
Poorly correlated
-3.01%
LOB - EQFN
3%
Poorly correlated
+4.30%
FRBA - EQFN
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.20%
More

FRBA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRBA has been closely correlated with STBA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FRBA jumps, then STBA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRBA
1D Price
Change %
FRBA100%
+0.20%
STBA - FRBA
83%
Closely correlated
-0.72%
SRCE - FRBA
83%
Closely correlated
-1.76%
EQBK - FRBA
82%
Closely correlated
-0.96%
TOWN - FRBA
82%
Closely correlated
-1.52%
FSBC - FRBA
82%
Closely correlated
+3.00%
More