EQBBF
Price
$33.75
Change
-$1.75 (-4.93%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
41.15B
MGLD
Price
$1.05
Change
+$0.01 (+0.96%)
Updated
Sep 8, 04:23 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
44.83M
Interact to see
Advertisement

EQBBF vs MGLD

Header iconEQBBF vs MGLD Comparison
Open Charts EQBBF vs MGLDBanner chart's image
EQT AB
Price$33.75
Change-$1.75 (-4.93%)
Volume$100
Capitalization41.15B
Marygold Companies (The)
Price$1.05
Change+$0.01 (+0.96%)
Volume$399
Capitalization44.83M
EQBBF vs MGLD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EQBBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MGLD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EQBBF vs. MGLD commentary
Sep 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EQBBF is a Hold and MGLD is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 09, 2025
Stock price -- (EQBBF: $33.75 vs. MGLD: $1.04)
Brand notoriety: EQBBF and MGLD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EQBBF: 2% vs. MGLD: 71%
Market capitalization -- EQBBF: $41.15B vs. MGLD: $44.83M
EQBBF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $41.15B. MGLD’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $44.83M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EQBBF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMGLD’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EQBBF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MGLD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MGLD is a better buy in the long-term than EQBBF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EQBBF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MGLD’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EQBBF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MGLD’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MGLD is a better buy in the short-term than EQBBF.

Price Growth

EQBBF (@Investment Managers) experienced а -4.93% price change this week, while MGLD (@Investment Managers) price change was +13.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +44.99%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.12% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EQBBF($41.1B) has a higher market cap than MGLD($44.8M). EQBBF YTD gains are higher at: 14.136 vs. MGLD (-40.909). EQBBF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.47B vs. MGLD (-6.7M). EQBBF has more cash in the bank: 5.58B vs. MGLD (15.6M). MGLD has less debt than EQBBF: MGLD (4.92M) vs EQBBF (2.6B). EQBBF has higher revenues than MGLD: EQBBF (2.7B) vs MGLD (31.2M).
EQBBFMGLDEQBBF / MGLD
Capitalization41.1B44.8M91,741%
EBITDA1.47B-6.7M-21,970%
Gain YTD14.136-40.909-35%
P/E Ratio40.71N/A-
Revenue2.7B31.2M8,638%
Total Cash5.58B15.6M35,763%
Total Debt2.6B4.92M52,843%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EQBBF vs MGLD: Fundamental Ratings
EQBBF
MGLD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
85
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7593
SMR RATING
1..100
6996
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5147
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
973
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4450

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EQBBF's Valuation (32) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MGLD (85). This means that EQBBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MGLD’s over the last 12 months.

EQBBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as MGLD (93). This means that EQBBF’s stock grew similarly to MGLD’s over the last 12 months.

EQBBF's SMR Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as MGLD (96). This means that EQBBF’s stock grew similarly to MGLD’s over the last 12 months.

MGLD's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as EQBBF (51). This means that MGLD’s stock grew similarly to EQBBF’s over the last 12 months.

MGLD's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for EQBBF (97). This means that MGLD’s stock grew significantly faster than EQBBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EQBBFMGLD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EQBBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MGLD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ELDN2.710.10
+3.83%
Eledon Pharmaceuticals
COOT0.53N/A
+0.57%
Australian Oilseeds Holdings Limited
IIIN38.88-0.05
-0.13%
Insteel Industries
SYF75.61-1.25
-1.63%
Synchrony Financial
APLS28.13-0.52
-1.82%
Apellis Pharmaceuticals

EQBBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EQBBF and PIAC have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EQBBF and PIAC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EQBBF
1D Price
Change %
EQBBF100%
N/A
PIAC - EQBBF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ESIFF - EQBBF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MGLD - EQBBF
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.96%
DTSRF - EQBBF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CNDCF - EQBBF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MGLD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MGLD and HNNA have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MGLD and HNNA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGLD
1D Price
Change %
MGLD100%
+1.96%
HNNA - MGLD
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.33%
RESCU - MGLD
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ICMB - MGLD
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.86%
EICA - MGLD
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.20%
EICC - MGLD
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.40%
More