EQBBF
Price
$39.50
Change
+$1.56 (+4.11%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
45.47B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
ESIFF
Price
$0.16
Change
-$0.01 (-5.88%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
Capitalization
6.32M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

EQBBF vs ESIFF

Header iconEQBBF vs ESIFF Comparison
Open Charts EQBBF vs ESIFFBanner chart's image
EQT AB
Price$39.50
Change+$1.56 (+4.11%)
Volume$100
Capitalization45.47B
AI ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE VENTURES
Price$0.16
Change-$0.01 (-5.88%)
Volume$363
Capitalization6.32M
EQBBF vs ESIFF Comparison Chart in %
EQBBF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ESIFF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EQBBF vs. ESIFF commentary
Dec 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EQBBF is a Buy and ESIFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 27, 2025
Stock price -- (EQBBF: $39.50 vs. ESIFF: $0.16)
Brand notoriety: EQBBF and ESIFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EQBBF: 16% vs. ESIFF: 17%
Market capitalization -- EQBBF: $45.47B vs. ESIFF: $6.32M
EQBBF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $45.47B. ESIFF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $6.32M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $168.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.54B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EQBBF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileESIFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EQBBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ESIFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, EQBBF is a better buy in the long-term than ESIFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EQBBF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ESIFF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EQBBF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • ESIFF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EQBBF is a better buy in the short-term than ESIFF.

Price Growth

EQBBF (@Investment Managers) experienced а +7.92% price change this week, while ESIFF (@Investment Managers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.03%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.91% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EQBBF($45.5B) has a higher market cap than ESIFF($6.32M). EQBBF has higher P/E ratio than ESIFF: EQBBF (47.10) vs ESIFF (4.48). EQBBF YTD gains are higher at: 33.581 vs. ESIFF (-37.801). EQBBF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.47B vs. ESIFF (-103.07K). EQBBF has more cash in the bank: 5.58B vs. ESIFF (2.01M). ESIFF has less debt than EQBBF: ESIFF (360K) vs EQBBF (2.6B). EQBBF has higher revenues than ESIFF: EQBBF (2.7B) vs ESIFF (176K).
EQBBFESIFFEQBBF / ESIFF
Capitalization45.5B6.32M720,165%
EBITDA1.47B-103.07K-1,428,197%
Gain YTD33.581-37.801-89%
P/E Ratio47.104.481,051%
Revenue2.7B176K1,531,250%
Total Cash5.58B2.01M278,116%
Total Debt2.6B360K722,778%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EQBBF vs ESIFF: Fundamental Ratings
EQBBF
ESIFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
826
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
72100
SMR RATING
1..100
68100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4165
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
96100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4890

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ESIFF's Valuation (79) in the null industry is in the same range as EQBBF (84). This means that ESIFF’s stock grew similarly to EQBBF’s over the last 12 months.

EQBBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as ESIFF (100). This means that EQBBF’s stock grew similarly to ESIFF’s over the last 12 months.

EQBBF's SMR Rating (68) in the null industry is in the same range as ESIFF (100). This means that EQBBF’s stock grew similarly to ESIFF’s over the last 12 months.

EQBBF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as ESIFF (65). This means that EQBBF’s stock grew similarly to ESIFF’s over the last 12 months.

EQBBF's P/E Growth Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as ESIFF (100). This means that EQBBF’s stock grew similarly to ESIFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EQBBFESIFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EQBBF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ESIFF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GROV1.180.01
+0.85%
Grove Collaborative Holdings
PHOE15.99N/A
N/A
Phoenix Asia Holdings Limited
CADE43.85-0.01
-0.02%
Cadence Bank
IMPPP25.47-0.62
-2.38%
Imperial Petroleum
PCT9.01-0.27
-2.91%
PureCycle Technologies

EQBBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EQBBF and PIAC have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EQBBF and PIAC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EQBBF
1D Price
Change %
EQBBF100%
N/A
PIAC - EQBBF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFXDF - EQBBF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.62%
ESIFF - EQBBF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CNDCF - EQBBF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DTSRF - EQBBF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

ESIFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ESIFF and TEKCF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ESIFF and TEKCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ESIFF
1D Price
Change %
ESIFF100%
N/A
TEKCF - ESIFF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DTSRF - ESIFF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MGLD - ESIFF
4%
Poorly correlated
+5.49%
EQBBF - ESIFF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CYMBF - ESIFF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More