EPR
Price
$54.47
Change
-$0.01 (-0.02%)
Updated
Oct 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.15B
12 days until earnings call
FRT
Price
$98.97
Change
+$0.94 (+0.96%)
Updated
Oct 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
8.46B
14 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

EPR vs FRT

Header iconEPR vs FRT Comparison
Open Charts EPR vs FRTBanner chart's image
EPR Properties
Price$54.47
Change-$0.01 (-0.02%)
Volume$2.91K
Capitalization4.15B
Federal Realty Investment Trust
Price$98.97
Change+$0.94 (+0.96%)
Volume$2.76K
Capitalization8.46B
EPR vs FRT Comparison Chart in %
EPR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FRT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EPR vs. FRT commentary
Oct 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EPR is a Hold and FRT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2025
Stock price -- (EPR: $54.48 vs. FRT: $98.03)
Brand notoriety: EPR and FRT are both not notable
EPR represents the Specialty Telecommunications, while FRT is part of the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EPR: 69% vs. FRT: 96%
Market capitalization -- EPR: $4.15B vs. FRT: $8.46B
EPR [@Specialty Telecommunications] is valued at $4.15B. FRT’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $8.46B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Telecommunications] industry ranges from $89.66B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Telecommunications] industry is $16.15B. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $6.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EPR’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileFRT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • EPR’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • FRT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, EPR is a better buy in the long-term than FRT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EPR’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FRT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EPR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FRT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FRT is a better buy in the short-term than EPR.

Price Growth

EPR (@Specialty Telecommunications) experienced а +0.29% price change this week, while FRT (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was +0.90% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Telecommunications industry was +0.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.83%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +1.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.95%.

Reported Earning Dates

EPR is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

FRT is expected to report earnings on Oct 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Telecommunications (+0.43% weekly)

Companies belonging to the specialty telecommunications sector provide voice and data transmission via a single method, such as fixed lines, digital subscriber lines (DSL), wireless technology, the internet or competitive local exchange carriers. Telefonica, Liberty Broadband Corp., and Zayo Group Holdings, Inc. are some of the big specialty telecom companies in the U.S.

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+1.81% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRT($8.46B) has a higher market cap than EPR($4.15B). EPR has higher P/E ratio than FRT: EPR (26.84) vs FRT (24.82). EPR YTD gains are higher at: 29.292 vs. FRT (-8.491). FRT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 883M vs. EPR (474M). EPR has less debt than FRT: EPR (3.01B) vs FRT (4.57B). FRT has higher revenues than EPR: FRT (1.24B) vs EPR (656M).
EPRFRTEPR / FRT
Capitalization4.15B8.46B49%
EBITDA474M883M54%
Gain YTD29.292-8.491-345%
P/E Ratio26.8424.82108%
Revenue656M1.24B53%
Total CashN/A18.6M-
Total Debt3.01B4.57B66%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EPR vs FRT: Fundamental Ratings
EPR
FRT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6158
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1946
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9644
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1976
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7521

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

EPR's Valuation (25) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRT (73). This means that EPR’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRT’s over the last 12 months.

EPR's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as FRT (46). This means that EPR’s stock grew similarly to FRT’s over the last 12 months.

EPR's SMR Rating (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as FRT (100). This means that EPR’s stock grew similarly to FRT’s over the last 12 months.

FRT's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EPR (96). This means that FRT’s stock grew somewhat faster than EPR’s over the last 12 months.

EPR's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRT (76). This means that EPR’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EPRFRT
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
50%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EPR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FRT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FNNEX76.120.22
+0.29%
American Funds New Economy 529-F-3
MTINX22.61-0.05
-0.22%
NYLI Income Builder Investor Class
SBASX12.79-0.09
-0.70%
Segall Bryant &Hamill Small Cap Cre Ins
ONRDX27.45-0.21
-0.76%
Invesco Rising Dividends R
LRSFX15.14-0.26
-1.69%
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value F

EPR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EPR has been closely correlated with EPRT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EPR jumps, then EPRT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EPR
1D Price
Change %
EPR100%
-1.86%
EPRT - EPR
72%
Closely correlated
+0.79%
FR - EPR
72%
Closely correlated
+1.40%
UE - EPR
71%
Closely correlated
-0.66%
FRT - EPR
70%
Closely correlated
-0.19%
EQR - EPR
70%
Closely correlated
-0.95%
More

FRT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRT has been closely correlated with KIM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FRT jumps, then KIM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRT
1D Price
Change %
FRT100%
-0.19%
KIM - FRT
88%
Closely correlated
-0.46%
KRG - FRT
86%
Closely correlated
-0.68%
REG - FRT
85%
Closely correlated
-0.98%
AKR - FRT
84%
Closely correlated
-0.05%
BRX - FRT
84%
Closely correlated
-0.81%
More