Advertisement
EPOAY vs HTCMF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EPOAY is a Hold and HTCMF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EPOAY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHTCMF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- EPOAY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- HTCMF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EPOAY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HTCMF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- EPOAY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- HTCMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
EPOAY (@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery) experienced а +2.33% price change this week, while HTCMF (@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery) price change was +9.19% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery industry was +1.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.53%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery (+1.87% weekly)The industry designs and builds agricultural, construction and other large commercial and transportation equipment. Tractors, planters and harvesters, as well as rock-crushing, railroad, demolition and other construction implements are produced by this industry. Rapid urbanization and industrialization has been bolstering the expansion of the construction sector in the past few decades, thereby boosting demand for heavy equipment businesses. Caterpillar Inc., Deere & Company and Cummins Inc (Ex. Cummins Engine Inc) are some prominent companies in this industry.
| EPOAY | HTCMF | EPOAY / HTCMF | |
| Capitalization | 28B | 7.07B | 396% |
| EBITDA | 14.9B | 238B | 6% |
| Gain YTD | 8.998 | 9.187 | 98% |
| P/E Ratio | 31.83 | 12.89 | 247% |
| Revenue | 63.2B | 1.36T | 5% |
| Total Cash | 11.3B | 159B | 7% |
| Total Debt | 21.6B | 591B | 4% |
EPOAY | HTCMF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 26 | 45 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 89 Overvalued | 17 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 60 | 65 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 43 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 33 | 20 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HTCMF's Valuation (17) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for EPOAY (89). This means that HTCMF’s stock grew significantly faster than EPOAY’s over the last 12 months.
EPOAY's Profit vs Risk Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as HTCMF (65). This means that EPOAY’s stock grew similarly to HTCMF’s over the last 12 months.
EPOAY's SMR Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HTCMF (100). This means that EPOAY’s stock grew somewhat faster than HTCMF’s over the last 12 months.
HTCMF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as EPOAY (46). This means that HTCMF’s stock grew similarly to EPOAY’s over the last 12 months.
HTCMF's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the null industry is in the same range as EPOAY (33). This means that HTCMF’s stock grew similarly to EPOAY’s over the last 12 months.
| EPOAY | HTCMF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 22% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 43% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 26% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 38% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 28% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 27% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 62% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago 63% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 50% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 3 days ago 19% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| RSPM | 36.97 | 0.27 | +0.75% |
| Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Matrls ETF | |||
| BSMY | 24.82 | 0.05 | +0.20% |
| Invesco BulletShares 2034 Muncpl Bd ETF | |||
| KVLE | 26.15 | 0.04 | +0.15% |
| KraneShares Value Line® Dyn Div Eq ETF | |||
| BOE | 12.00 | N/A | N/A |
| BlackRock Enhanced Global Dividend Trust | |||
| IWP | 140.88 | -0.51 | -0.36% |
| iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF | |||
EPOAY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EPOAY has been loosely correlated with VLVLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EPOAY jumps, then VLVLY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EPOAY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPOAY | 100% | +1.95% | ||
| VLVLY - EPOAY | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.30% | ||
| EPIAF - EPOAY | 50% Loosely correlated | +2.46% | ||
| CAT - EPOAY | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.35% | ||
| KIGRY - EPOAY | 46% Loosely correlated | -1.04% | ||
| OUKPY - EPOAY | 45% Loosely correlated | +3.67% | ||
More | ||||
HTCMF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that HTCMF and EXXRF have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HTCMF and EXXRF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HTCMF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HTCMF | 100% | N/A | ||
| EXXRF - HTCMF | 14% Poorly correlated | -0.06% | ||
| KIGRY - HTCMF | 11% Poorly correlated | -1.04% | ||
| HTCMY - HTCMF | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| EPOAY - HTCMF | 3% Poorly correlated | +1.95% | ||
| IMDXF - HTCMF | 0% Poorly correlated | +16.74% | ||
More | ||||