EPIPF vs XOS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EPIPF is a Hold and XOS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EPIPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileXOS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- EPIPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- XOS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
XOS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- XOS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
EPIPF (@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while XOS (@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery) price change was +94.17% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery industry was -1.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.51%.
Reported Earning Dates
XOS is expected to report earnings on Mar 25, 2024.
Industries' Descriptions
@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery (-1.30% weekly)The industry designs and builds agricultural, construction and other large commercial and transportation equipment. Tractors, planters and harvesters, as well as rock-crushing, railroad, demolition and other construction implements are produced by this industry. Rapid urbanization and industrialization has been bolstering the expansion of the construction sector in the past few decades, thereby boosting demand for heavy equipment businesses. Caterpillar Inc., Deere & Company and Cummins Inc (Ex. Cummins Engine Inc) are some prominent companies in this industry.
| EPIPF | XOS | EPIPF / XOS | |
| Capitalization | 22.9B | 78.7M | 29,098% |
| EBITDA | 15B | -73.55M | -20,396% |
| Gain YTD | -1.993 | 85.185 | -2% |
| P/E Ratio | 22.47 | 11.03 | 204% |
| Revenue | 56.5B | 34.7M | 162,824% |
| Total Cash | 6.56B | 22.6M | 29,035% |
| Total Debt | 14.2B | 37.4M | 37,968% |
EPIPF | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 48 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 32 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 61 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 42 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 74 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| XOS | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 59% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 62% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% |
EPIPF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that EPIPF and ASTE have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EPIPF and ASTE's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EPIPF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPIPF | 100% | N/A | ||
| ASTE - EPIPF | 26% Poorly correlated | -5.35% | ||
| XOS - EPIPF | 8% Poorly correlated | -4.00% | ||
| HYFM - EPIPF | 6% Poorly correlated | -1.03% | ||
| UGRO - EPIPF | 2% Poorly correlated | -5.22% | ||
| BEEP - EPIPF | 2% Poorly correlated | -6.12% | ||
More | ||||
XOS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that XOS and CEAD have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that XOS and CEAD's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XOS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XOS | 100% | -4.00% | ||
| CEAD - XOS | 15% Poorly correlated | -2.92% | ||
| CAT - XOS | 13% Poorly correlated | -2.61% | ||
| EPIPF - XOS | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NKLA - XOS | 8% Poorly correlated | -13.66% | ||
| GP - XOS | 6% Poorly correlated | -1.93% | ||
More | ||||