EPIAF
Price
$22.39
Change
+$0.53 (+2.42%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
22.9B
TGHLF
Price
$1.33
Change
-$0.02 (-1.48%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
51.26M
Interact to see
Advertisement

EPIAF vs TGHLF

Header iconEPIAF vs TGHLF Comparison
Open Charts EPIAF vs TGHLFBanner chart's image
Epiroc Aktiebolag
Price$22.39
Change+$0.53 (+2.42%)
Volume$1.65K
Capitalization22.9B
Tornado Infrastructure Equipment
Price$1.33
Change-$0.02 (-1.48%)
Volume$21.39K
Capitalization51.26M
EPIAF vs TGHLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EPIAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TGHLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EPIAF vs. TGHLF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EPIAF is a Hold and TGHLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (EPIAF: $22.40 vs. TGHLF: $1.33)
Brand notoriety: EPIAF and TGHLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EPIAF: 38% vs. TGHLF: 126%
Market capitalization -- EPIAF: $22.9B vs. TGHLF: $51.26M
EPIAF [@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery] is valued at $22.9B. TGHLF’s [@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery] market capitalization is $51.26M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery] industry ranges from $181.64B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery] industry is $12.41B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EPIAF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTGHLF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • EPIAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TGHLF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, TGHLF is a better buy in the long-term than EPIAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EPIAF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TGHLF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EPIAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TGHLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both EPIAF and TGHLF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

EPIAF (@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery) experienced а +2.65% price change this week, while TGHLF (@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery) price change was +9.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery industry was +4.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.35%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery (+4.23% weekly)

The industry designs and builds agricultural, construction and other large commercial and transportation equipment. Tractors, planters and harvesters, as well as rock-crushing, railroad, demolition and other construction implements are produced by this industry. Rapid urbanization and industrialization has been bolstering the expansion of the construction sector in the past few decades, thereby boosting demand for heavy equipment businesses. Caterpillar Inc., Deere & Company and Cummins Inc (Ex. Cummins Engine Inc) are some prominent companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EPIAF($22.9B) has a higher market cap than TGHLF($51.3M). EPIAF has higher P/E ratio than TGHLF: EPIAF (26.81) vs TGHLF (25.25). TGHLF YTD gains are higher at: 75.069 vs. EPIAF (29.376). EPIAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 15B vs. TGHLF (4.72M). EPIAF has more cash in the bank: 6.56B vs. TGHLF (1.32M). TGHLF has less debt than EPIAF: TGHLF (10.6M) vs EPIAF (14.2B). EPIAF has higher revenues than TGHLF: EPIAF (56.5B) vs TGHLF (70.4M).
EPIAFTGHLFEPIAF / TGHLF
Capitalization22.9B51.3M44,639%
EBITDA15B4.72M317,528%
Gain YTD29.37675.06939%
P/E Ratio26.8125.25106%
Revenue56.5B70.4M80,256%
Total Cash6.56B1.32M499,011%
Total Debt14.2B10.6M133,962%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TGHLF: Fundamental Ratings
TGHLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
90
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5
SMR RATING
1..100
30
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
36
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
11
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EPIAFTGHLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
66%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EPIAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TGHLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CNR68.15N/A
N/A
Core Natural Resources Inc
VLTO101.12N/A
N/A
Veralto Corp
AMBC7.04-0.04
-0.56%
Ambac Financial Group
NXTC0.45-0.01
-2.17%
NextCure
SST6.32-1.53
-19.49%
System1

EPIAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EPIAF has been loosely correlated with EPOAY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EPIAF jumps, then EPOAY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EPIAF
1D Price
Change %
EPIAF100%
+2.41%
EPOAY - EPIAF
52%
Loosely correlated
+2.23%
VLVLY - EPIAF
30%
Poorly correlated
+4.24%
DTRUY - EPIAF
29%
Poorly correlated
+5.02%
OUKPY - EPIAF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.16%
DTGHF - EPIAF
23%
Poorly correlated
+5.97%
More

TGHLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TGHLF and TRATF have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TGHLF and TRATF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TGHLF
1D Price
Change %
TGHLF100%
-1.48%
TRATF - TGHLF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DTRUY - TGHLF
5%
Poorly correlated
+5.02%
EPIAF - TGHLF
4%
Poorly correlated
+2.41%
VAPE - TGHLF
3%
Poorly correlated
+2.94%
IVCGF - TGHLF
2%
Poorly correlated
+3.97%
More