EPAC
Price
$44.17
Change
-$0.70 (-1.56%)
Updated
Dec 20, 04:59 PM (EDT)
87 days until earnings call
FSS
Price
$91.87
Change
+$0.10 (+0.11%)
Updated
Dec 20, 04:59 PM (EDT)
72 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

EPAC vs FSS

Header iconEPAC vs FSS Comparison
Open Charts EPAC vs FSSBanner chart's image
Enerpac Tool Group
Price$44.17
Change-$0.70 (-1.56%)
Volume$7.88K
CapitalizationN/A
Federal Signal
Price$91.87
Change+$0.10 (+0.11%)
Volume$2.75K
CapitalizationN/A
EPAC vs FSS Comparison Chart
Loading...
EPAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FSS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EPAC vs. FSS commentary
Dec 22, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EPAC is a Hold and FSS is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 22, 2024
Stock price -- (EPAC: $44.16 vs. FSS: $91.80)
Brand notoriety: EPAC and FSS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Industrial Machinery industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EPAC: 385% vs. FSS: 176%
Market capitalization -- EPAC: $1.93B vs. FSS: $5.2B
EPAC [@Industrial Machinery] is valued at $1.93B. FSS’s [@Industrial Machinery] market capitalization is $5.2B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Industrial Machinery] industry ranges from $135.33B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Industrial Machinery] industry is $9.23B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EPAC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFSS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EPAC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FSS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, EPAC is a better buy in the long-term than FSS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EPAC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FSS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EPAC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FSS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EPAC is a better buy in the short-term than FSS.

Price Growth

EPAC (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а -9.58% price change this week, while FSS (@Industrial Machinery) price change was -4.84% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was -1.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

EPAC is expected to report earnings on Mar 19, 2025.

FSS is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Industrial Machinery (-1.81% weekly)

The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSS($5.2B) has a higher market cap than EPAC($1.93B). FSS has higher P/E ratio than EPAC: FSS (33.27) vs EPAC (26.10). EPAC YTD gains are higher at: 42.173 vs. FSS (20.281). FSS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 283M vs. EPAC (128M). EPAC has more cash in the bank: 154M vs. FSS (61M). EPAC has less debt than FSS: EPAC (245M) vs FSS (321M). FSS has higher revenues than EPAC: FSS (1.72B) vs EPAC (597M).
EPACFSSEPAC / FSS
Capitalization1.93B5.2B37%
EBITDA128M283M45%
Gain YTD42.17320.281208%
P/E Ratio26.1033.2778%
Revenue597M1.72B35%
Total Cash154M61M252%
Total Debt245M321M76%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EPAC vs FSS: Fundamental Ratings
EPAC
FSS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6190
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
205
SMR RATING
1..100
5148
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4849
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5081
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FSS's Valuation (73) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is in the same range as EPAC (78) in the null industry. This means that FSS’s stock grew similarly to EPAC’s over the last 12 months.

FSS's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is in the same range as EPAC (20) in the null industry. This means that FSS’s stock grew similarly to EPAC’s over the last 12 months.

FSS's SMR Rating (48) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is in the same range as EPAC (51) in the null industry. This means that FSS’s stock grew similarly to EPAC’s over the last 12 months.

EPAC's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as FSS (49) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry. This means that EPAC’s stock grew similarly to FSS’s over the last 12 months.

EPAC's P/E Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as FSS (81) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry. This means that EPAC’s stock grew similarly to FSS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EPACFSS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
EPAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FSS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME29.820.82
+2.83%
GameStop Corp
AAPL254.494.70
+1.88%
Apple
SPY591.157.02
+1.20%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X97224.730000-531.203100
-0.54%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA421.06-15.11
-3.46%
Tesla

EPAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EPAC has been loosely correlated with FSS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EPAC jumps, then FSS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EPAC
1D Price
Change %
EPAC100%
-1.58%
FSS - EPAC
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.03%
NPO - EPAC
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.24%
FELE - EPAC
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.35%
KMT - EPAC
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.60%
ITT - EPAC
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.81%
More

FSS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSS has been closely correlated with NPO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FSS jumps, then NPO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSS
1D Price
Change %
FSS100%
+0.03%
NPO - FSS
71%
Closely correlated
-1.24%
ITT - FSS
70%
Closely correlated
+0.81%
FELE - FSS
69%
Closely correlated
-0.35%
PH - FSS
67%
Closely correlated
+1.24%
FLS - FSS
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.15%
More