EOGSF
Price
$3.23
Change
-$0.18 (-5.29%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
2.05B
OMGGF
Price
$0.89
Change
+$0.07 (+8.54%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
539.54M
Interact to see
Advertisement

EOGSF vs OMGGF

Header iconEOGSF vs OMGGF Comparison
Open Charts EOGSF vs OMGGFBanner chart's image
Emerald Oil & Gas NL
Price$3.23
Change-$0.18 (-5.29%)
Volume$10.02K
Capitalization2.05B
OMAI GOLD MINES
Price$0.89
Change+$0.07 (+8.54%)
Volume$36.26K
Capitalization539.54M
EOGSF vs OMGGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
EOGSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OMGGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EOGSF vs. OMGGF commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EOGSF is a Hold and OMGGF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (EOGSF: $3.22 vs. OMGGF: $0.89)
Brand notoriety: EOGSF and OMGGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EOGSF: 49% vs. OMGGF: 42%
Market capitalization -- EOGSF: $2.05B vs. OMGGF: $539.54M
EOGSF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $2.05B. OMGGF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $539.54M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $102.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EOGSF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileOMGGF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EOGSF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • OMGGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, EOGSF is a better buy in the long-term than OMGGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

EOGSF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OMGGF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • EOGSF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • OMGGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, EOGSF is a better buy in the short-term than OMGGF.

Price Growth

EOGSF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +7.50% price change this week, while OMGGF (@Precious Metals) price change was +14.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +3.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +27.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6008.39%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+3.52% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EOGSF($2.05B) has a higher market cap than OMGGF($540M). OMGGF YTD gains are higher at: 418.081 vs. EOGSF (57.317). EOGSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 214M vs. OMGGF (-10.22M). EOGSF has higher revenues than OMGGF: EOGSF (427M) vs OMGGF (0).
EOGSFOMGGFEOGSF / OMGGF
Capitalization2.05B540M379%
EBITDA214M-10.22M-2,095%
Gain YTD57.317418.08114%
P/E Ratio37.00N/A-
Revenue427M0-
Total CashN/A18.6M-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EOGSF vs OMGGF: Fundamental Ratings
EOGSF
OMGGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8421
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
166
SMR RATING
1..100
5298
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3934
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1754
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5074

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OMGGF's Valuation (86) in the null industry is in the same range as EOGSF (97). This means that OMGGF’s stock grew similarly to EOGSF’s over the last 12 months.

OMGGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the null industry is in the same range as EOGSF (16). This means that OMGGF’s stock grew similarly to EOGSF’s over the last 12 months.

EOGSF's SMR Rating (52) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OMGGF (98). This means that EOGSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than OMGGF’s over the last 12 months.

OMGGF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as EOGSF (39). This means that OMGGF’s stock grew similarly to EOGSF’s over the last 12 months.

EOGSF's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OMGGF (54). This means that EOGSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than OMGGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
EOGSFOMGGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
EOGSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OMGGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GLRBX24.36N/A
N/A
James Balanced: Golden Rainbow R
NRIIX22.40-0.08
-0.36%
Nuveen Real Asset Income I
CNWCX89.71-0.71
-0.79%
American Funds New World 529C
ARTMX38.34-0.31
-0.80%
Artisan Mid Cap Investor
AZBIX26.00-0.21
-0.80%
Virtus Small-Cap Institutional

EOGSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EOGSF and WFRSF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EOGSF and WFRSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EOGSF
1D Price
Change %
EOGSF100%
-5.15%
WFRSF - EOGSF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OMGGF - EOGSF
3%
Poorly correlated
+8.92%
TAJIF - EOGSF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A