ENSC
Price
$0.57
Change
-$0.04 (-6.56%)
Updated
Feb 4, 02:31 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.21M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MLLCF
Price
$3.50
Change
+$0.05 (+1.45%)
Updated
Sep 17 closing price
Capitalization
164.16M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ENSC vs MLLCF

Header iconENSC vs MLLCF Comparison
Open Charts ENSC vs MLLCFBanner chart's image
Ensysce Biosciences
Price$0.57
Change-$0.04 (-6.56%)
Volume$500
Capitalization2.21M
Molecular Partners AG
Price$3.50
Change+$0.05 (+1.45%)
Volume$190
Capitalization164.16M
ENSC vs MLLCF Comparison Chart in %
ENSC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MLLCF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ENSC vs. MLLCF commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ENSC is a Hold and MLLCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (ENSC: $0.61 vs. MLLCF: $2.25)
Brand notoriety: ENSC and MLLCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Biotechnology industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ENSC: 82% vs. MLLCF: 32%
Market capitalization -- ENSC: $2.21M vs. MLLCF: $164.16M
ENSC [@Biotechnology] is valued at $2.21M. MLLCF’s [@Biotechnology] market capitalization is $164.16M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Biotechnology] industry ranges from $118.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Biotechnology] industry is $2.23B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ENSC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMLLCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ENSC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MLLCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both ENSC and MLLCF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ENSC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MLLCF’s TA Score has 0 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ENSC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MLLCF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ENSC is a better buy in the short-term than MLLCF.

Price Growth

ENSC (@Biotechnology) experienced а -28.01% price change this week, while MLLCF (@Biotechnology) price change was -4.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Biotechnology industry was -2.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +33.05%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Biotechnology (-2.39% weekly)

Biotechnology involves genetic or protein engineering to produce medicines/therapies for treating and preventing ailments. The industry also provides crucial ingredients for diagnostics. This multi-billion-dollar industry is heavily focused on research and development, as companies attempt to continually come up with cutting-edge solutions for health. New discoveries for the treatment of diseases provide opportunities for growth for a company in this industry. Discoveries, however, must pass the regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can make it to markets. Amgen Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Celgene Corporation are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLLCF($164M) has a higher market cap than ENSC($2.22M). ENSC YTD gains are higher at: -33.728 vs. MLLCF (-35.711). ENSC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -10.95M vs. MLLCF (-58.01M). MLLCF has more cash in the bank: 105M vs. ENSC (1.67M). ENSC has less debt than MLLCF: ENSC (388K) vs MLLCF (1.53M). ENSC (0) and MLLCF (0) have equivalent revenues.
ENSCMLLCFENSC / MLLCF
Capitalization2.22M164M1%
EBITDA-10.95M-58.01M19%
Gain YTD-33.728-35.71194%
P/E Ratio0.02N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash1.67M105M2%
Total Debt388K1.53M25%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ENSC vs MLLCF: Fundamental Ratings
ENSC
MLLCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5493
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
45
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10097
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9694
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7382
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ENSC's Valuation (21) in the null industry is in the same range as MLLCF (45). This means that ENSC’s stock grew similarly to MLLCF’s over the last 12 months.

ENSC's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as MLLCF (100). This means that ENSC’s stock grew similarly to MLLCF’s over the last 12 months.

MLLCF's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as ENSC (100). This means that MLLCF’s stock grew similarly to ENSC’s over the last 12 months.

MLLCF's Price Growth Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as ENSC (96). This means that MLLCF’s stock grew similarly to ENSC’s over the last 12 months.

ENSC's P/E Growth Rating (73) in the null industry is in the same range as MLLCF (82). This means that ENSC’s stock grew similarly to MLLCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ENSCMLLCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
79%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ENSC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MLLCF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WMS156.380.08
+0.05%
Advanced Drainage Systems
NTB52.71-0.09
-0.17%
Bank of NT Butterfield & Son Limited (The)
PRPL0.66-0.01
-1.34%
Purple Innovation
BDRX1.63-0.07
-4.12%
Biodexa Pharmaceuticals plc
SBC4.54-0.38
-7.72%
SBC Medical Group Holdings Incorporated

ENSC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ENSC has been loosely correlated with RLMD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ENSC jumps, then RLMD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ENSC
1D Price
Change %
ENSC100%
-14.10%
RLMD - ENSC
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.78%
MLLCF - ENSC
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ITRM - ENSC
35%
Loosely correlated
-6.41%
RGNX - ENSC
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.74%
HNSBF - ENSC
33%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More

MLLCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MLLCF has been loosely correlated with ENSC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MLLCF jumps, then ENSC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MLLCF
1D Price
Change %
MLLCF100%
N/A
ENSC - MLLCF
37%
Loosely correlated
-14.10%
CYYNF - MLLCF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HNSBF - MLLCF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
URGN - MLLCF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.52%
GNPX - MLLCF
24%
Poorly correlated
-3.61%
More