Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ENFR vs MLPA
ENFR vs MLPA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ENFR vs. MLPA commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ENFR is a Hold and MLPA is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLPA has more net assets: 1.94B vs. ENFR (331M). MLPA has a higher annual dividend yield than ENFR: MLPA (4.462) vs ENFR (1.383). ENFR was incepted earlier than MLPA: ENFR (12 years) vs MLPA (14 years). ENFR (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than MLPA (0.45). ENFR has a higher turnover MLPA (28.89) vs MLPA (28.89).
| ENFR | MLPA | ENFR / MLPA | |
| Gain YTD | 1.383 | 4.462 | 31% |
| Net Assets | 331M | 1.94B | 17% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.45 | 78% |
| Turnover | 33.00 | 28.89 | 114% |
| Yield | 4.77 | 7.83 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| ENFR | MLPA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 73% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
ENFR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ENFR has been closely correlated with OKE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ENFR jumps, then OKE could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ENFR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ENFR | 100% | +0.76% | ||
| OKE - ENFR | 86% Closely correlated | +2.15% | ||
| TRGP - ENFR | 84% Closely correlated | +1.39% | ||
| WMB - ENFR | 83% Closely correlated | +0.36% | ||
| KMI - ENFR | 83% Closely correlated | +0.55% | ||
| ET - ENFR | 82% Closely correlated | +0.57% | ||
More | ||||
MLPA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MLPA has been closely correlated with ET. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MLPA jumps, then ET could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MLPA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MLPA | 100% | +0.66% | ||
| ET - MLPA | 82% Closely correlated | +0.57% | ||
| MPLX - MLPA | 78% Closely correlated | +1.26% | ||
| EPD - MLPA | 77% Closely correlated | +0.40% | ||
| PAA - MLPA | 77% Closely correlated | +0.32% | ||
| USAC - MLPA | 76% Closely correlated | -0.55% | ||
More | ||||