ENADF
Price
$1.57
Change
+$0.07 (+4.64%)
Updated
Oct 1 closing price
Capitalization
159.4M
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
TOST
Price
$37.79
Change
+$1.95 (+5.44%)
Updated
Oct 14 closing price
Capitalization
22.03B
27 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ENADF vs TOST

Header iconENADF vs TOST Comparison
Open Charts ENADF vs TOSTBanner chart's image
Enad Global 7 AB
Price$1.57
Change+$0.07 (+4.64%)
Volume$8.4K
Capitalization159.4M
Toast
Price$37.79
Change+$1.95 (+5.44%)
Volume$10.97M
Capitalization22.03B
ENADF vs TOST Comparison Chart in %
ENADF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TOST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ENADF vs. TOST commentary
Oct 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ENADF is a Hold and TOST is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 16, 2025
Stock price -- (ENADF: $1.58 vs. TOST: $37.79)
Brand notoriety: ENADF and TOST are both not notable
ENADF represents the Electronics/Appliances, while TOST is part of the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ENADF: 316% vs. TOST: 135%
Market capitalization -- ENADF: $159.4M vs. TOST: $22.03B
ENADF [@Electronics/Appliances] is valued at $159.4M. TOST’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $22.03B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronics/Appliances] industry ranges from $403.7B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.82T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronics/Appliances] industry is $13.16B. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $27.98B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ENADF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTOST’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ENADF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TOST’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ENADF is a better buy in the long-term than TOST.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ENADF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TOST’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ENADF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • TOST’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TOST is a better buy in the short-term than ENADF.

Price Growth

ENADF (@Electronics/Appliances) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TOST (@Computer Communications) price change was +1.67% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronics/Appliances industry was -3.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.26%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +0.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +76.36%.

Reported Earning Dates

TOST is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronics/Appliances (-3.14% weekly)

TVs, telephones, washing machines, home speakers and even home-office equipment like computers and printers…the list is virtually endless when it comes to consumer electronics and appliances. And, with ‘smarthomes’ increasingly becoming the reality, we could see a sharp surge in high-tech gadgets (including robotic appliances) making their way into our homes– and therefore spelling plenty opportunities in the related industries. Consumers account for 70% of US GDP, and their purchases of high-functioning electronics could make significant dents in the economy’s health. Sony Corp., Whirlpool and iRobot are some of the major consumer electronics/appliances makers.

@Computer Communications (+0.91% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TOST($22B) has a higher market cap than ENADF($159M). ENADF has higher P/E ratio than TOST: ENADF (288.35) vs TOST (96.90). ENADF YTD gains are higher at: 34.615 vs. TOST (3.676). ENADF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 418M vs. TOST (254M). TOST has more cash in the bank: 1.7B vs. ENADF (454M). TOST has less debt than ENADF: TOST (19M) vs ENADF (389M). TOST has higher revenues than ENADF: TOST (5.53B) vs ENADF (1.96B).
ENADFTOSTENADF / TOST
Capitalization159M22B1%
EBITDA418M254M165%
Gain YTD34.6153.676942%
P/E Ratio288.3596.90298%
Revenue1.96B5.53B35%
Total Cash454M1.7B27%
Total Debt389M19M2,047%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ENADFTOST
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
17%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
18%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ENADF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TOST
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GAUAX5.350.04
+0.75%
Gabelli Utilities A
PMFKX13.170.02
+0.15%
Victory Pioneer Multi-Asset Income R6
CUSCX11.62N/A
N/A
Cullen Small Cap Value C
RMGSX11.84-0.01
-0.08%
Russell Inv Multi-Asset Strat S
TSAGX64.45-0.85
-1.30%
Touchstone Large Company Growth A

ENADF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ENADF and CRM have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ENADF and CRM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ENADF
1D Price
Change %
ENADF100%
N/A
CRM - ENADF
30%
Poorly correlated
-3.61%
GXAI - ENADF
29%
Poorly correlated
-2.71%
BLZE - ENADF
22%
Poorly correlated
-3.39%
GENTF - ENADF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TOST - ENADF
20%
Poorly correlated
+5.44%
More