ENADF
Price
$1.39
Change
+$0.02 (+1.46%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Capitalization
245.97M
FREKF
Price
$23.51
Change
-$2.76 (-10.51%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
1.28B
Interact to see
Advertisement

ENADF vs FREKF

Header iconENADF vs FREKF Comparison
Open Charts ENADF vs FREKFBanner chart's image
Enad Global 7 AB
Price$1.39
Change+$0.02 (+1.46%)
Volume$500
Capitalization245.97M
FREEE K K
Price$23.51
Change-$2.76 (-10.51%)
Volume$120
Capitalization1.28B
ENADF vs FREKF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ENADF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FREKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ENADF vs. FREKF commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ENADF is a Hold and FREKF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (ENADF: $1.39 vs. FREKF: $23.51)
Brand notoriety: ENADF and FREKF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ENADF: 12% vs. FREKF: 10%
Market capitalization -- ENADF: $245.97M vs. FREKF: $1.28B
ENADF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $245.97M. FREKF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $1.28B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ENADF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFREKF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ENADF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FREKF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ENADF is a better buy in the long-term than FREKF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ENADF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FREKF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ENADF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FREKF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ENADF is a better buy in the short-term than FREKF.

Price Growth

ENADF (@Packaged Software) experienced а +1.25% price change this week, while FREKF (@Packaged Software) price change was -10.52% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +3.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.66%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+3.56% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FREKF($1.28B) has a higher market cap than ENADF($246M). FREKF YTD gains are higher at: 22.257 vs. ENADF (18.556). ENADF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 576M vs. FREKF (-17.89B). FREKF has more cash in the bank: 37.3B vs. ENADF (453M). FREKF has less debt than ENADF: FREKF (119M) vs ENADF (458M). FREKF has higher revenues than ENADF: FREKF (17.7B) vs ENADF (2.05B).
ENADFFREKFENADF / FREKF
Capitalization246M1.28B19%
EBITDA576M-17.89B-3%
Gain YTD18.55622.25783%
P/E Ratio18.45N/A-
Revenue2.05B17.7B12%
Total Cash453M37.3B1%
Total Debt458M119M385%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ENADFFREKF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
9%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
20%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
15%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
16%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ENADF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FREKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BGGKX29.840.26
+0.88%
Baillie Gifford US Equity Growth K
AWSYX16.790.12
+0.72%
Invesco Global Core Equity Y
SRECX13.320.03
+0.23%
PGIM Select Real Estate C
ACCLX15.420.03
+0.19%
American Century Mid Cap Value C
FSENX57.75-0.30
-0.52%
Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio

ENADF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ENADF and CRM have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ENADF and CRM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ENADF
1D Price
Change %
ENADF100%
N/A
CRM - ENADF
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.99%
GXAI - ENADF
29%
Poorly correlated
+3.68%
FMTO - ENADF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BLZE - ENADF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GENTF - ENADF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FREKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FREKF and RDZN have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FREKF and RDZN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FREKF
1D Price
Change %
FREKF100%
-10.52%
RDZN - FREKF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SQNXF - FREKF
23%
Poorly correlated
+4.46%
BKKT - FREKF
11%
Poorly correlated
-4.13%
ENADF - FREKF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SOPA - FREKF
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.76%
More