Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMXC vs QLVE
EMXC vs QLVE Comparison
Open Charts EMXC vs QLVE
iShares MSCI Emerging Mkts ex China ETF
Price$63.70
Change-$0.41 (-0.64%)
Volume$959.49K
Net Assets13.77B
FlexShares EMs Quality Lw Vol ETF
Price$27.89
Change+$0.04 (+0.14%)
Volume$139
Net Assets14.02M
EMXC vs QLVE Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMXC vs. QLVE commentary
Jul 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMXC is a StrongBuy and QLVE is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EMXC has more net assets: 13.8B vs. QLVE (14M). EMXC has a higher annual dividend yield than QLVE: EMXC (16.227) vs QLVE (13.066). EMXC was incepted earlier than QLVE: EMXC (8 years) vs QLVE (6 years). QLVE (0.18) has a lower expense ratio than EMXC (0.25). QLVE has a higher turnover EMXC (12.00) vs EMXC (12.00).
| EMXC | QLVE | EMXC / QLVE | |
| Gain YTD | 16.227 | 13.066 | 124% |
| Net Assets | 13.8B | 14M | 98,571% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 0.18 | 139% |
| Turnover | 12.00 | 96.00 | 13% |
| Yield | 2.71 | 3.26 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EMXC | QLVE | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 64% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 81% | 18 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 78% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
EMXC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EMXC has been loosely correlated with TEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EMXC jumps, then TEL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EMXC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMXC | 100% | -0.64% | ||
| TEL - EMXC | 57% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| SCCO - EMXC | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.07% | ||
| NU - EMXC | 50% Loosely correlated | -6.93% | ||
| OUT - EMXC | 48% Loosely correlated | -1.81% | ||
| BAP - EMXC | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.30% | ||
More | ||||
QLVE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QLVE has been loosely correlated with BIDU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QLVE jumps, then BIDU could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QLVE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QLVE | 100% | +0.11% | ||
| BIDU - QLVE | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.34% | ||
| AP - QLVE | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.62% | ||
| BAP - QLVE | 1% Poorly correlated | +0.30% | ||
| NTES - QLVE | 0% Poorly correlated | +2.20% | ||
| PDD - QLVE | -2% Poorly correlated | +3.68% | ||
More | ||||