Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMXC vs QLVE
EMXC vs QLVE Comparison
Open Charts EMXC vs QLVE
iShares MSCI Emerging Mkts ex China ETF
Price$62.96
Change-$0.10 (-0.16%)
Volume$2.75M
Net Assets13.62B
FlexShares EMs Quality Lw Vol ETF
Price$27.59
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$106
Net Assets13.86M
EMXC vs QLVE Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMXC vs. QLVE commentary
Jun 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMXC is a Hold and QLVE is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EMXC has more net assets: 13.6B vs. QLVE (13.9M). EMXC has a higher annual dividend yield than QLVE: EMXC (14.877) vs QLVE (11.850). EMXC was incepted earlier than QLVE: EMXC (8 years) vs QLVE (6 years). QLVE (0.18) has a lower expense ratio than EMXC (0.25). QLVE has a higher turnover EMXC (12.00) vs EMXC (12.00).
| EMXC | QLVE | EMXC / QLVE | |
| Gain YTD | 14.877 | 11.850 | 126% |
| Net Assets | 13.6B | 13.9M | 97,842% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 0.18 | 139% |
| Turnover | 12.00 | 96.00 | 13% |
| Yield | 2.51 | 3.24 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EMXC | QLVE | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 64% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 72% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
EMXC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EMXC has been loosely correlated with TEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EMXC jumps, then TEL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EMXC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMXC | 100% | -0.16% | ||
| TEL - EMXC | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.29% | ||
| SCCO - EMXC | 53% Loosely correlated | -2.04% | ||
| NU - EMXC | 50% Loosely correlated | -1.05% | ||
| OUT - EMXC | 48% Loosely correlated | -0.91% | ||
| BAP - EMXC | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.38% | ||
More | ||||
QLVE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QLVE has been loosely correlated with BIDU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QLVE jumps, then BIDU could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QLVE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QLVE | 100% | +0.01% | ||
| BIDU - QLVE | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.38% | ||
| AP - QLVE | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.34% | ||
| BAP - QLVE | 1% Poorly correlated | +0.38% | ||
| NTES - QLVE | 0% Poorly correlated | -0.15% | ||
| PDD - QLVE | -2% Poorly correlated | -0.58% | ||
More | ||||