Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMXC vs QLVE
EMXC vs QLVE Comparison
Open Charts EMXC vs QLVE
iShares MSCI Emerging Mkts ex China ETF
Price$64.40
Change+$0.56 (+0.88%)
Volume$1.83M
Net Assets12.61B
FlexShares EMs Quality Lw Vol ETF
Price$27.92
Change-$0.12 (-0.43%)
Volume$180
Net Assets14.11M
EMXC vs QLVE Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMXC vs. QLVE commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMXC is a StrongBuy and QLVE is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EMXC has more net assets: 12.6B vs. QLVE (14.1M). EMXC has a higher annual dividend yield than QLVE: EMXC (17.505) vs QLVE (13.189). EMXC was incepted earlier than QLVE: EMXC (8 years) vs QLVE (6 years). QLVE (0.18) has a lower expense ratio than EMXC (0.25). QLVE has a higher turnover EMXC (12.00) vs EMXC (12.00).
| EMXC | QLVE | EMXC / QLVE | |
| Gain YTD | 17.505 | 13.189 | 133% |
| Net Assets | 12.6B | 14.1M | 89,362% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 0.18 | 139% |
| Turnover | 12.00 | 96.00 | 13% |
| Yield | 2.70 | 3.20 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EMXC | QLVE | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 62% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 78% | 11 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
EMXC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EMXC has been loosely correlated with TEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EMXC jumps, then TEL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EMXC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMXC | 100% | +0.88% | ||
| TEL - EMXC | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.10% | ||
| OUT - EMXC | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.55% | ||
| LTM - EMXC | 56% Loosely correlated | -2.08% | ||
| CLS - EMXC | 55% Loosely correlated | +9.64% | ||
| INFY - EMXC | 50% Loosely correlated | -1.27% | ||
More | ||||
QLVE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QLVE has been loosely correlated with BIDU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QLVE jumps, then BIDU could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QLVE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QLVE | 100% | N/A | ||
| BIDU - QLVE | 51% Loosely correlated | +3.82% | ||
| AP - QLVE | 28% Poorly correlated | -1.79% | ||
| BAP - QLVE | 1% Poorly correlated | +0.47% | ||
| NTES - QLVE | 0% Poorly correlated | +0.85% | ||
| PDD - QLVE | -2% Poorly correlated | +0.65% | ||
More | ||||