Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMXC vs QLVE
EMXC vs QLVE Comparison
Open Charts EMXC vs QLVE
iShares MSCI Emerging Mkts ex China ETF
Price$79.92
Change-$1.35 (-1.66%)
Volume$436
Net Assets15.86B
FlexShares EMs Quality Lw Vol ETF
Price$31.22
Change+$2.10 (+7.21%)
Volume$168
Net Assets15.45M
EMXC vs QLVE Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMXC vs. QLVE commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMXC is a Hold and QLVE is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EMXC has more net assets: 15.9B vs. QLVE (15.5M). EMXC has a higher annual dividend yield than QLVE: EMXC (11.833) vs QLVE (6.034). EMXC was incepted earlier than QLVE: EMXC (9 years) vs QLVE (7 years). QLVE (0.18) has a lower expense ratio than EMXC (0.25). QLVE has a higher turnover EMXC (15.00) vs EMXC (15.00).
| EMXC | QLVE | EMXC / QLVE | |
| Gain YTD | 11.833 | 6.034 | 196% |
| Net Assets | 15.9B | 15.5M | 102,581% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 0.18 | 139% |
| Turnover | 15.00 | 48.00 | 31% |
| Yield | 2.57 | 2.95 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EMXC | QLVE | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 13 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 77% | 6 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
EMXC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EMXC has been loosely correlated with TEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EMXC jumps, then TEL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EMXC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMXC | 100% | +1.11% | ||
| TEL - EMXC | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| OUT - EMXC | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.95% | ||
| CLS - EMXC | 53% Loosely correlated | +4.33% | ||
| LTM - EMXC | 51% Loosely correlated | -1.05% | ||
| NU - EMXC | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.06% | ||
More | ||||
QLVE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that QLVE and ZTO have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QLVE and ZTO's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QLVE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QLVE | 100% | -0.08% | ||
| ZTO - QLVE | 5% Poorly correlated | +1.72% | ||
| JD - QLVE | 5% Poorly correlated | -1.72% | ||
| YUMC - QLVE | 4% Poorly correlated | +0.32% | ||
| BAP - QLVE | 2% Poorly correlated | +2.00% | ||
| VOD - QLVE | 2% Poorly correlated | +2.28% | ||
More | ||||