Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMXC vs QLVE
EMXC vs QLVE Comparison
Open Charts EMXC vs QLVE
iShares MSCI Emerging Mkts ex China ETF
Price$64.04
Change-$0.04 (-0.06%)
Volume$25.17K
Net Assets13.06B
FlexShares EMs Quality Lw Vol ETF
Price$28.03
Change+$0.19 (+0.68%)
Volume$114
Net Assets14.04M
EMXC vs QLVE Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMXC vs. QLVE commentary
Aug 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMXC is a StrongBuy and QLVE is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EMXC has more net assets: 13.1B vs. QLVE (14M). EMXC has a higher annual dividend yield than QLVE: EMXC (16.921) vs QLVE (13.641). EMXC was incepted earlier than QLVE: EMXC (8 years) vs QLVE (6 years). QLVE (0.18) has a lower expense ratio than EMXC (0.25). QLVE has a higher turnover EMXC (12.00) vs EMXC (12.00).
| EMXC | QLVE | EMXC / QLVE | |
| Gain YTD | 16.921 | 13.641 | 124% |
| Net Assets | 13.1B | 14M | 93,571% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 0.18 | 139% |
| Turnover | 12.00 | 96.00 | 13% |
| Yield | 2.71 | 3.22 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EMXC | QLVE | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 65% | 4 days ago 68% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% | 4 days ago 59% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 57% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 81% | 6 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 78% | 11 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
EMXC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EMXC has been loosely correlated with OUT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EMXC jumps, then OUT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EMXC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMXC | 100% | -0.23% | ||
| OUT - EMXC | 63% Loosely correlated | -5.53% | ||
| TEL - EMXC | 61% Loosely correlated | +1.03% | ||
| LTM - EMXC | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.76% | ||
| INFY - EMXC | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.19% | ||
| CLS - EMXC | 53% Loosely correlated | +3.21% | ||
More | ||||
QLVE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QLVE has been loosely correlated with BIDU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QLVE jumps, then BIDU could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QLVE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QLVE | 100% | +0.69% | ||
| BIDU - QLVE | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.13% | ||
| AP - QLVE | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.58% | ||
| BAP - QLVE | 1% Poorly correlated | +1.30% | ||
| NTES - QLVE | 0% Poorly correlated | -1.76% | ||
| PDD - QLVE | -2% Poorly correlated | +0.06% | ||
More | ||||