Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMXC vs OAEM
EMXC vs OAEM Comparison
Open Charts EMXC vs OAEM
iShares MSCI Emerging Mkts ex China ETF
Price$64.70
Change+$0.33 (+0.51%)
Volume$11.91K
Net Assets13.16B
OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF
Price$33.12
Change+$0.15 (+0.45%)
Volume$100
Net Assets57.05M
EMXC vs OAEM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMXC vs. OAEM commentary
Aug 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMXC is a StrongBuy and OAEM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EMXC has more net assets: 13.2B vs. OAEM (57.1M). EMXC has a higher annual dividend yield than OAEM: EMXC (17.468) vs OAEM (13.111). EMXC was incepted earlier than OAEM: EMXC (8 years) vs OAEM (3 years). EMXC (0.25) has a lower expense ratio than OAEM (1.25). OAEM has a higher turnover EMXC (12.00) vs EMXC (12.00).
| EMXC | OAEM | EMXC / OAEM | |
| Gain YTD | 17.468 | 13.111 | 133% |
| Net Assets | 13.2B | 57.1M | 23,117% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 1.25 | 20% |
| Turnover | 12.00 | 35.00 | 34% |
| Yield | 2.71 | 0.81 | 334% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EMXC | OAEM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 81% | 6 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | 12 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
EMXC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EMXC has been loosely correlated with TEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EMXC jumps, then TEL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EMXC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMXC | 100% | +0.02% | ||
| TEL - EMXC | 61% Loosely correlated | -2.06% | ||
| OUT - EMXC | 60% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| LTM - EMXC | 55% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| CLS - EMXC | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.59% | ||
| INFY - EMXC | 51% Loosely correlated | +1.10% | ||
More | ||||
OAEM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that OAEM and SUZ have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OAEM and SUZ's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OAEM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OAEM | 100% | -0.03% | ||
| SUZ - OAEM | 6% Poorly correlated | -0.50% | ||
| NU - OAEM | 6% Poorly correlated | +9.08% | ||
| MELI - OAEM | 6% Poorly correlated | +3.13% | ||
| WIT - OAEM | 6% Poorly correlated | +0.74% | ||
| HDB - OAEM | 4% Poorly correlated | +1.56% | ||
More | ||||