Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMXC vs OAEM
EMXC vs OAEM Comparison
Open Charts EMXC vs OAEM
iShares MSCI Emerging Mkts ex China ETF
Price$61.33
Change+$0.04 (+0.07%)
Volume$41.85K
Net Assets13.74B
OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF
Price$32.19
Change+$0.38 (+1.19%)
Volume$350
Net Assets50.95M
EMXC vs OAEM Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMXC vs. OAEM commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMXC is a Hold and OAEM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EMXC has more net assets: 13.7B vs. OAEM (50.9M). EMXC has a higher annual dividend yield than OAEM: EMXC (10.532) vs OAEM (9.147). EMXC was incepted earlier than OAEM: EMXC (8 years) vs OAEM (3 years). EMXC (0.25) has a lower expense ratio than OAEM (1.25). OAEM has a higher turnover EMXC (12.00) vs EMXC (12.00).
| EMXC | OAEM | EMXC / OAEM | |
| Gain YTD | 10.532 | 9.147 | 115% |
| Net Assets | 13.7B | 50.9M | 26,916% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 1.25 | 20% |
| Turnover | 12.00 | 35.00 | 34% |
| Yield | 2.51 | 0.87 | 290% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EMXC | OAEM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 81% | 5 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 26 days ago 78% | 20 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 63% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
EMXC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EMXC has been loosely correlated with TEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EMXC jumps, then TEL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EMXC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMXC | 100% | -1.51% | ||
| TEL - EMXC | 57% Loosely correlated | -2.04% | ||
| SCCO - EMXC | 53% Loosely correlated | -1.23% | ||
| OUT - EMXC | 48% Loosely correlated | -3.17% | ||
| NU - EMXC | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.83% | ||
| BAP - EMXC | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.54% | ||
More | ||||
OAEM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that OAEM and HDB have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OAEM and HDB's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OAEM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OAEM | 100% | -0.87% | ||
| HDB - OAEM | 30% Poorly correlated | -2.57% | ||
| WIT - OAEM | 30% Poorly correlated | -1.66% | ||
| INFY - OAEM | 26% Poorly correlated | -0.75% | ||
| MMYT - OAEM | 25% Poorly correlated | -1.69% | ||
| NU - OAEM | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.83% | ||
More | ||||