Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMXC vs OAEM
EMXC vs OAEM Comparison
Open Charts EMXC vs OAEM
iShares MSCI Emerging Mkts ex China ETF
Price$64.82
Change+$0.42 (+0.65%)
Volume$15.11K
Net Assets12.69B
OneAscent Emerging Markets ETF
Price$33.14
Change+$0.40 (+1.22%)
Volume$10.44K
Net Assets56.41M
EMXC vs OAEM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMXC vs. OAEM commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMXC is a StrongBuy and OAEM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EMXC has more net assets: 12.7B vs. OAEM (56.4M). EMXC has a higher annual dividend yield than OAEM: EMXC (17.505) vs OAEM (12.355). EMXC was incepted earlier than OAEM: EMXC (8 years) vs OAEM (3 years). EMXC (0.25) has a lower expense ratio than OAEM (1.25). OAEM has a higher turnover EMXC (12.00) vs EMXC (12.00).
| EMXC | OAEM | EMXC / OAEM | |
| Gain YTD | 17.505 | 12.355 | 142% |
| Net Assets | 12.7B | 56.4M | 22,518% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 1.25 | 20% |
| Turnover | 12.00 | 35.00 | 34% |
| Yield | 2.70 | 0.82 | 328% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EMXC | OAEM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 27 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 78% | 7 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
EMXC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EMXC has been loosely correlated with TEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EMXC jumps, then TEL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EMXC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMXC | 100% | +0.88% | ||
| TEL - EMXC | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.10% | ||
| OUT - EMXC | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.55% | ||
| LTM - EMXC | 56% Loosely correlated | -2.08% | ||
| CLS - EMXC | 55% Loosely correlated | +9.64% | ||
| INFY - EMXC | 50% Loosely correlated | -1.27% | ||
More | ||||
OAEM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that OAEM and SUZ have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OAEM and SUZ's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OAEM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OAEM | 100% | +0.57% | ||
| SUZ - OAEM | 8% Poorly correlated | +1.05% | ||
| MELI - OAEM | 8% Poorly correlated | -0.01% | ||
| WIT - OAEM | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| HDB - OAEM | 5% Poorly correlated | -0.06% | ||
| NU - OAEM | 5% Poorly correlated | -0.87% | ||
More | ||||