Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMXC vs FTHF
EMXC vs FTHF Comparison
Open Charts EMXC vs FTHF
iShares MSCI Emerging Mkts ex China ETF
Price$64.41
Change+$0.57 (+0.89%)
Volume$19.03K
Net Assets12.61B
FT EM Human Flourishing ETF
Price$27.56
Change+$0.24 (+0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets48.98M
EMXC vs FTHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMXC vs. FTHF commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMXC is a StrongBuy and FTHF is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EMXC has more net assets: 12.6B vs. FTHF (49M). FTHF has a higher annual dividend yield than EMXC: FTHF (30.614) vs EMXC (16.483). EMXC was incepted earlier than FTHF: EMXC (8 years) vs FTHF (2 years). EMXC (0.25) has a lower expense ratio than FTHF (0.75). FTHF has a higher turnover EMXC (12.00) vs EMXC (12.00).
| EMXC | FTHF | EMXC / FTHF | |
| Gain YTD | 16.483 | 30.614 | 54% |
| Net Assets | 12.6B | 49M | 25,714% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 0.75 | 33% |
| Turnover | 12.00 | 30.00 | 40% |
| Yield | 2.70 | 2.70 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EMXC | FTHF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 61% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 29 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
EMXC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EMXC has been loosely correlated with TEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EMXC jumps, then TEL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EMXC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMXC | 100% | +0.27% | ||
| TEL - EMXC | 61% Loosely correlated | +1.24% | ||
| OUT - EMXC | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.05% | ||
| LTM - EMXC | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.31% | ||
| CLS - EMXC | 55% Loosely correlated | +4.47% | ||
| INFY - EMXC | 50% Loosely correlated | -0.30% | ||
More | ||||
FTHF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTHF has been loosely correlated with OUT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FTHF jumps, then OUT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTHF | 100% | N/A | ||
| OUT - FTHF | 33% Loosely correlated | -0.05% | ||
| SLM - FTHF | 23% Poorly correlated | +3.35% | ||
| ABG - FTHF | 20% Poorly correlated | +2.10% | ||
| SM - FTHF | 20% Poorly correlated | +1.47% | ||
| CLS - FTHF | 20% Poorly correlated | +4.47% | ||
More | ||||