Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMXC vs FTHF
EMXC vs FTHF Comparison
Open Charts EMXC vs FTHF
iShares MSCI Emerging Mkts ex China ETF
Price$62.96
Change-$0.10 (-0.16%)
Volume$2.75M
Net Assets13.62B
FT EM Human Flourishing ETF
Price$26.41
Change-$0.06 (-0.23%)
Volume$3.77K
Net Assets46.4M
EMXC vs FTHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMXC vs. FTHF commentary
Jun 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMXC is a StrongBuy and FTHF is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EMXC has more net assets: 13.6B vs. FTHF (46.4M). FTHF has a higher annual dividend yield than EMXC: FTHF (26.241) vs EMXC (14.877). EMXC was incepted earlier than FTHF: EMXC (8 years) vs FTHF (2 years). EMXC (0.25) has a lower expense ratio than FTHF (0.75). FTHF has a higher turnover EMXC (12.00) vs EMXC (12.00).
| EMXC | FTHF | EMXC / FTHF | |
| Gain YTD | 14.877 | 26.241 | 57% |
| Net Assets | 13.6B | 46.4M | 29,310% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 0.75 | 33% |
| Turnover | 12.00 | 30.00 | 40% |
| Yield | 2.51 | 2.77 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EMXC | FTHF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
EMXC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EMXC has been loosely correlated with TEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EMXC jumps, then TEL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EMXC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMXC | 100% | -0.16% | ||
| TEL - EMXC | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.29% | ||
| SCCO - EMXC | 53% Loosely correlated | -2.04% | ||
| NU - EMXC | 50% Loosely correlated | -1.05% | ||
| OUT - EMXC | 48% Loosely correlated | -0.91% | ||
| BAP - EMXC | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.38% | ||
More | ||||
FTHF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTHF has been loosely correlated with OUT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FTHF jumps, then OUT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTHF | 100% | -0.21% | ||
| OUT - FTHF | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.91% | ||
| ABG - FTHF | 38% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| SLM - FTHF | 38% Loosely correlated | +1.98% | ||
| SM - FTHF | 35% Loosely correlated | -1.34% | ||
| CLS - FTHF | 34% Loosely correlated | +1.68% | ||
More | ||||