Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMSQX vs RNWBX
EMSQX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts EMSQX vs RNWBX
Shelton Emerging Markets Institutiona
Price$19.49
Change+$0.13 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets22.75M
American Funds New World R2
Price$88.91
Change+$0.20 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.3B
EMSQX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMSQX vs. RNWBX commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMSQX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. EMSQX (22.8M). EMSQX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: EMSQX (3.23) vs RNWBX (0.12). EMSQX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: EMSQX (29 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). EMSQX (1.77) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). EMSQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMSQX: RNWBX (250) vs EMSQX (500000). RNWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.18 vs. EMSQX (14.86). EMSQX return over 5 years is better than : 9.51 vs. RNWBX (7.90).
| EMSQX | RNWBX | EMSQX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.67 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 1.67 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.943 | 20.884 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 250 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 22.8M | 75.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.23 | 0.12 | 2,739% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.86 | 19.18 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.53 | 41.02 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.51 | 7.90 | 120% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.97 | 82.81 | 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement