Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMSQX vs RNWBX
EMSQX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts EMSQX vs RNWBX
Shelton Emerging Markets Institutiona
Price$21.20
Change-$0.99 (-4.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.67M
American Funds New World R2
Price$94.05
Change+$2.72 (+2.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
EMSQX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMSQX vs. RNWBX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMSQX is a StrongBuy and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. EMSQX (24.7M). EMSQX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: EMSQX (1.56) vs RNWBX (0.45). EMSQX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: EMSQX (29 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). EMSQX (1.77) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.66). EMSQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. RNWBX (46.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMSQX: RNWBX (250) vs EMSQX (500000). EMSQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.47 vs. RNWBX (26.27). EMSQX return over 5 years is better than : 11.35 vs. RNWBX (7.03).
| EMSQX | RNWBX | EMSQX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 1.66 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 1.66 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.821 | 5.996 | 180% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 250 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.7M | 75.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.56 | 0.45 | 346% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.47 | 26.27 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.74 | 38.81 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.35 | 7.03 | 161% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.23 | 114.19 | 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement