Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMSLX vs RNWBX
EMSLX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts EMSLX vs RNWBX
Shelton Emerging Markets Investor
Price$18.74
Change+$0.08 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets22.14M
American Funds New World R2
Price$92.32
Change+$0.15 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.3B
EMSLX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMSLX vs. RNWBX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMSLX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. EMSLX (22.1M). EMSLX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: EMSLX (3.16) vs RNWBX (0.12). EMSLX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: EMSLX (20 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). EMSLX (2.02) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). EMSLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMSLX: RNWBX (250) vs EMSLX (1000). RNWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.78 vs. EMSLX (11.32). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 14.40 vs. EMSLX (9.47).
| EMSLX | RNWBX | EMSLX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.67 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.02 | 1.67 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.587 | 24.772 | 47% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 22.1M | 75.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.16 | 0.12 | 2,682% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.32 | 18.78 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.14 | 40.66 | 37% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.47 | 14.40 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.52 | 87.08 | 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers