Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMSF vs SCHE
EMSF vs SCHE Comparison
Open Charts EMSF vs SCHE
Matthews Emerging Markets Sus Fut ActETF
Price$29.97
Change-$0.05 (-0.17%)
Volume$1.29K
Net Assets31.53M
Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF™
Price$33.36
Change-$0.04 (-0.12%)
Volume$1.25M
Net Assets11.35B
EMSF vs SCHE Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMSF vs. SCHE commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMSF is a Hold and SCHE is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHE has more net assets: 11.4B vs. EMSF (31.5M). SCHE has a higher annual dividend yield than EMSF: SCHE (25.514) vs EMSF (23.955). EMSF was incepted earlier than SCHE: EMSF (2 years) vs SCHE (16 years). SCHE (0.07) has a lower expense ratio than EMSF (0.79). EMSF has a higher turnover SCHE (8.00) vs SCHE (8.00).
| EMSF | SCHE | EMSF / SCHE | |
| Gain YTD | 23.955 | 25.514 | 94% |
| Net Assets | 31.5M | 11.4B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.07 | 1,129% |
| Turnover | 45.12 | 8.00 | 564% |
| Yield | 2.65 | 2.43 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 16 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EMSF | SCHE | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 90% | 7 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 78% | 7 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 83% | 7 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 86% | 7 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 84% | 7 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 75% | 7 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 80% | 7 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 86% | 14 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 89% | 7 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 87% | 7 days ago 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
EMSF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that EMSF and BZ have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EMSF and BZ's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EMSF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMSF | 100% | -0.03% | ||
| BZ - EMSF | 13% Poorly correlated | -1.19% | ||
| YMM - EMSF | 10% Poorly correlated | -0.09% | ||
| LEGN - EMSF | 6% Poorly correlated | -0.54% | ||
| LRCX - EMSF | 1% Poorly correlated | +2.21% | ||
| ZH - EMSF | 0% Poorly correlated | -0.28% | ||
More | ||||
SCHE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHE has been closely correlated with JD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCHE jumps, then JD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHE | 100% | -0.31% | ||
| JD - SCHE | 73% Closely correlated | +0.54% | ||
| BILI - SCHE | 71% Closely correlated | -2.83% | ||
| BIDU - SCHE | 69% Closely correlated | -0.60% | ||
| BZ - SCHE | 66% Closely correlated | -1.19% | ||
| ATHM - SCHE | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.22% | ||
More | ||||