EMSF | NUEM | EMSF / NUEM | |
Gain YTD | 22.586 | 26.258 | 86% |
Net Assets | 31M | 324M | 10% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.36 | 219% |
Turnover | 45.12 | 58.00 | 78% |
Yield | 2.74 | 1.59 | 172% |
Fund Existence | 2 years | 8 years | - |
EMSF | NUEM | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago89% | 2 days ago63% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago86% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago88% | 2 days ago86% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago80% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 2 days ago85% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago85% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago78% | 3 days ago85% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago86% | 9 days ago81% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago88% | 2 days ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago88% | 2 days ago85% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that EMSF and LRCX have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EMSF and LRCX's prices will move in lockstep.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NUEM has been loosely correlated with ATHM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NUEM jumps, then ATHM could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NUEM | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
NUEM | 100% | -0.18% | ||
ATHM - NUEM | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.52% | ||
BZ - NUEM | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.81% | ||
BABA - NUEM | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.19% | ||
BIDU - NUEM | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.73% | ||
NIO - NUEM | 55% Loosely correlated | -1.17% | ||
More |