EMSF | IEMG | EMSF / IEMG | |
Gain YTD | 22.586 | 29.718 | 76% |
Net Assets | 31M | 112B | 0% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.09 | 878% |
Turnover | 45.12 | 7.00 | 645% |
Yield | 2.74 | 2.85 | 96% |
Fund Existence | 2 years | 13 years | - |
EMSF | IEMG | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago89% | 2 days ago69% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% | 2 days ago70% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago88% | 2 days ago85% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago75% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 2 days ago82% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago79% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago78% | 3 days ago83% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago86% | 9 days ago80% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago88% | 2 days ago82% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago88% | 2 days ago85% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that EMSF and LRCX have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EMSF and LRCX's prices will move in lockstep.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IEMG has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IEMG jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IEMG | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
IEMG | 100% | -0.10% | ||
BABA - IEMG | 75% Closely correlated | +1.19% | ||
JD - IEMG | 69% Closely correlated | +1.01% | ||
BILI - IEMG | 68% Closely correlated | -0.88% | ||
BIDU - IEMG | 66% Loosely correlated | -0.73% | ||
BZ - IEMG | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.81% | ||
More |