Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMRSX vs RNWBX
EMRSX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts EMRSX vs RNWBX
JPMorgan Emerging Mkts Rsrch Enh Eq R6
Price$22.14
Change+$0.06 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.99B
American Funds New World R2
Price$92.29
Change-$0.25 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
EMRSX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMRSX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMRSX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. EMRSX (1.99B). EMRSX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: EMRSX (3.68) vs RNWBX (0.48). EMRSX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: EMRSX (7 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than EMRSX (0.41). EMRSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMRSX: RNWBX (250) vs EMRSX (15000000). EMRSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 44.50 vs. RNWBX (27.43). EMRSX return over 5 years is better than : 13.86 vs. RNWBX (8.49).
| EMRSX | RNWBX | EMRSX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.67 | 21% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.67 | 25% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.429 | 4.012 | 135% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 15000000 | 250 | 6,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.99B | 75.5B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.68 | 0.48 | 773% |
| Returns for 1 year | 44.50 | 27.43 | 162% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.59 | 38.02 | 136% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.86 | 8.49 | 163% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 111.70 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement