Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMRIX vs RNWHX
EMRIX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts EMRIX vs RNWHX
VanEck Emerging Markets I
Price$19.84
Change+$1.85 (+10.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets351.93M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$97.53
Change+$2.43 (+2.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
EMRIX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMRIX vs. RNWHX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMRIX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. EMRIX (352M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than EMRIX: RNWHX (1.25) vs EMRIX (1.12). EMRIX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: EMRIX (18 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). EMRIX (1.25) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). RNWHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. EMRIX (19.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMRIX: RNWHX (250) vs EMRIX (1000000). EMRIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 41.97 vs. RNWHX (27.68). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 11.69 vs. EMRIX (-11.34).
| EMRIX | RNWHX | EMRIX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.72 | 142% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.72 | 174% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.593 | 6.092 | 141% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 352M | 75.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.12 | 1.25 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 41.97 | 27.68 | 152% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.60 | 43.24 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.34 | 11.69 | -97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.72 | 124.21 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement