Advertisement
EMR vs GTLS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMR is a Hold and GTLS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EMR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGTLS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- EMR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- GTLS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EMR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GTLS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- EMR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- GTLS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
EMR (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а +1.88% price change this week, while GTLS (@Industrial Machinery) price change was +0.01% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was +1.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +28.25%.
Reported Earning Dates
EMR is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.
GTLS is expected to report earnings on Oct 31, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Industrial Machinery (+1.27% weekly)The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.
| EMR | GTLS | EMR / GTLS | |
| Capitalization | 74B | 8.96B | 826% |
| EBITDA | 4.69B | 971M | 483% |
| Gain YTD | 7.416 | 4.496 | 165% |
| P/E Ratio | 33.79 | 36.66 | 92% |
| Revenue | 17.8B | 4.25B | 419% |
| Total Cash | 2.22B | 342M | 649% |
| Total Debt | 14.9B | 3.67B | 406% |
EMR | GTLS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 17 | 70 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 56 Fair valued | 75 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 27 | 47 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 60 | 77 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 85 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
EMR's Valuation (56) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as GTLS (75) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that EMR’s stock grew similarly to GTLS’s over the last 12 months.
EMR's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as GTLS (47) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that EMR’s stock grew similarly to GTLS’s over the last 12 months.
EMR's SMR Rating (60) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as GTLS (77) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that EMR’s stock grew similarly to GTLS’s over the last 12 months.
GTLS's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as EMR (50) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that GTLS’s stock grew similarly to EMR’s over the last 12 months.
EMR's P/E Growth Rating (52) in the Electrical Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GTLS (85) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that EMR’s stock grew somewhat faster than GTLS’s over the last 12 months.
| EMR | GTLS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 51% | 2 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 60% | 17 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 22 days ago 55% | 6 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 84% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| RSP | 188.71 | 0.23 | +0.12% |
| Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight ETF | |||
| AVIV | 67.27 | 0.05 | +0.07% |
| Avantis International Large Cap Val ETF | |||
| OEUR | 32.84 | -0.02 | -0.05% |
| ALPS O'Shares Europe Quality Div ETF | |||
| FFGX | 29.75 | -0.05 | -0.16% |
| Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF | |||
| FDM | 76.86 | -0.20 | -0.26% |
| First Trust Dow Jones Sel MicroCap ETF | |||
EMR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EMR has been closely correlated with PH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EMR jumps, then PH could also see price increases.
GTLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GTLS has been closely correlated with FLS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GTLS jumps, then FLS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GTLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTLS | 100% | -0.10% | ||
| FLS - GTLS | 76% Closely correlated | -0.69% | ||
| PH - GTLS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.03% | ||
| ETN - GTLS | 64% Loosely correlated | -2.59% | ||
| DOV - GTLS | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.68% | ||
| EMR - GTLS | 61% Loosely correlated | -1.04% | ||
More | ||||