Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMQIX vs RNWBX
EMQIX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts EMQIX vs RNWBX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Active Eq Instl
Price$9.61
Change+$0.02 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.14M
American Funds New World R2
Price$88.71
Change+$0.03 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.3B
EMQIX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMQIX vs. RNWBX commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMQIX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. EMQIX (5.14M). EMQIX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: EMQIX (1.78) vs RNWBX (0.12). EMQIX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: EMQIX (9 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). EMQIX (2.00) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). EMQIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 237.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMQIX: RNWBX (250) vs EMQIX (1000000). EMQIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.74 vs. RNWBX (18.68). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 7.66 vs. EMQIX (-18.79).
| EMQIX | RNWBX | EMQIX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.67 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 1.67 | 120% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.406 | 20.612 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.14M | 75.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.78 | 0.12 | 1,509% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.74 | 18.68 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.44 | 40.84 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | -18.79 | 7.66 | -245% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 83.29 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement