Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMQCX vs RNWBX
EMQCX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts EMQCX vs RNWBX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Active Eq C
Price$9.49
Change-$0.02 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.61M
American Funds New World R2
Price$90.79
Change-$0.09 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.64B
EMQCX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMQCX vs. RNWBX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMQCX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 74.6B vs. EMQCX (13.6M). EMQCX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: EMQCX (1.44) vs RNWBX (0.12). EMQCX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: EMQCX (9 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). EMQCX (3.02) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). EMQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 237.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMQCX: RNWBX (250) vs EMQCX (1000). EMQCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.15 vs. RNWBX (14.20). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 24.32 vs. EMQCX (-9.67).
| EMQCX | RNWBX | EMQCX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.05 | 1.67 | 123% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.02 | 1.67 | 181% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.051 | 23.440 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.6M | 74.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.44 | 0.12 | 1,191% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.15 | 14.20 | 149% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.41 | 54.19 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.67 | 24.32 | -40% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 85.87 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement