Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMQAX vs RNWBX
EMQAX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts EMQAX vs RNWBX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Active Eq A
Price$9.90
Change-$0.13 (-1.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.34M
American Funds New World R2
Price$92.33
Change-$1.19 (-1.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.61B
EMQAX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMQAX vs. RNWBX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMQAX is a Buy and RNWBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 76.6B vs. EMQAX (13.3M). EMQAX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: EMQAX (1.50) vs RNWBX (0.12). EMQAX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: EMQAX (9 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). EMQAX (2.25) is less costly to investors than RNWBX (1.67). EMQAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 237.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). RNWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMQAX: RNWBX (250) vs EMQAX (1000). EMQAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.23 vs. RNWBX (19.74). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 19.82 vs. EMQAX (-10.75).
| EMQAX | RNWBX | EMQAX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.67 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.25 | 1.67 | 135% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.622 | 25.534 | 116% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13.3M | 76.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.50 | 0.12 | 1,277% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.23 | 19.74 | 133% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.52 | 45.78 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.75 | 19.82 | -54% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 89.72 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers