Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMQAX vs RNWAX
EMQAX vs RNWAX Comparison
Open Charts EMQAX vs RNWAX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Active Eq A
Price$10.21
Change+$0.04 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.5M
American Funds New World R1
Price$92.33
Change-$0.26 (-0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
EMQAX vs RNWAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMQAX vs. RNWAX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMQAX is a Hold and RNWAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWAX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. EMQAX (5.5M). EMQAX pays higher dividends than RNWAX: EMQAX (5.05) vs RNWAX (0.56). EMQAX was incepted earlier than RNWAX: EMQAX (9 years) vs RNWAX (24 years). EMQAX (2.25) is less costly to investors than RNWAX (1.66). EMQAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 237.00 vs. RNWAX (37.00). RNWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMQAX: RNWAX (250) vs EMQAX (1000). EMQAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 41.00 vs. RNWAX (27.46). RNWAX return over 5 years is better than : 8.47 vs. EMQAX (-17.69).
| EMQAX | RNWAX | EMQAX / RNWAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.66 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.25 | 1.66 | 136% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.244 | 4.022 | 155% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.5M | 75.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.05 | 0.56 | 901% |
| Returns for 1 year | 41.00 | 27.46 | 149% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.75 | 38.06 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | -17.69 | 8.47 | -209% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 111.63 | - |