EMPYF
Price
$0.28
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
WHGOF
Price
$0.16
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
Ad is loading...

EMPYF vs WHGOF

Header iconEMPYF vs WHGOF Comparison
Open Charts EMPYF vs WHGOFBanner chart's image
Empress Royalty
Price$0.28
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$59.5K
CapitalizationN/A
White Gold
Price$0.16
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$12.06K
CapitalizationN/A
EMPYF vs WHGOF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
EMPYF vs. WHGOF commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMPYF is a Hold and WHGOF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (EMPYF: $0.28 vs. WHGOF: $0.16)
Brand notoriety: EMPYF and WHGOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: EMPYF: 42% vs. WHGOF: 41%
Market capitalization -- EMPYF: $27.64M vs. WHGOF: $42.16M
EMPYF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $27.64M. WHGOF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $42.16M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

EMPYF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWHGOF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • EMPYF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WHGOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both EMPYF and WHGOF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

EMPYF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -7.33% price change this week, while WHGOF (@Precious Metals) price change was -14.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -4.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.89%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-4.57% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WHGOF($42.2M) has a higher market cap than EMPYF($27.6M). EMPYF YTD gains are higher at: 22.144 vs. WHGOF (-20.098). WHGOF has more cash in the bank: 3.72M vs. EMPYF (783K).
EMPYFWHGOFEMPYF / WHGOF
Capitalization27.6M42.2M65%
EBITDAN/A144K-
Gain YTD22.144-20.098-110%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A0-
Total Cash783K3.72M21%
Total Debt2.98MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
WHGOF: Fundamental Ratings
WHGOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
74
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
89
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
62
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

EMPYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EMPYF and ELEMF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EMPYF and ELEMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMPYF
1D Price
Change %
EMPYF100%
+6.11%
ELEMF - EMPYF
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.22%
STLRF - EMPYF
27%
Poorly correlated
-2.55%
SMAGF - EMPYF
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.99%
WHGOF - EMPYF
23%
Poorly correlated
-6.32%
IRVRF - EMPYF
21%
Poorly correlated
-8.52%
More

WHGOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WHGOF and ZIJMF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WHGOF and ZIJMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WHGOF
1D Price
Change %
WHGOF100%
-6.32%
ZIJMF - WHGOF
27%
Poorly correlated
-4.07%
TORXF - WHGOF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.70%
TEUTF - WHGOF
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.60%
STLRF - WHGOF
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.55%
NSRPF - WHGOF
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.36%
More