99 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMM vs GRAB
EMM vs GRAB Comparison
Open Charts EMM vs GRAB
Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF
Price$30.35
Change+$0.09 (+0.30%)
Volume$164
Net Assets27.2M
Grab Holdings
Price$4.81
Change-$0.07 (-1.43%)
Volume$9.61K
Capitalization19.89B
EMM vs GRAB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMM vs. GRAB commentary
Aug 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMM is a Hold and GRAB is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EMM | GRAB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 84% | 21 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 82% | 11 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SRS | 48.51 | 0.87 | +1.83% |
| ProShares UltraShort Real Estate | |||
| SUSA | 129.84 | 0.77 | +0.60% |
| iShares ESG Optimized MSCI USA ETF | |||
| KBWP | 118.40 | 0.62 | +0.53% |
| Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Ins ETF | |||
| OPER | 100.26 | 0.03 | +0.03% |
| ClearShares Ultra-Short Maturity ETF | |||
| PCLO | 24.98 | 0.01 | +0.02% |
| Virtus SEIX AAA Private Credit CLO ETF | |||
EMM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EMM has been loosely correlated with TSM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EMM jumps, then TSM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EMM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMM | 100% | -0.68% | ||
| TSM - EMM | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.33% | ||
| IBN - EMM | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.09% | ||
| HDB - EMM | 46% Loosely correlated | -1.33% | ||
| MMYT - EMM | 45% Loosely correlated | -1.07% | ||
| GRAB - EMM | 45% Loosely correlated | -1.41% | ||
More | ||||
GRAB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GRAB has been loosely correlated with QTWO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GRAB jumps, then QTWO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GRAB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GRAB | 100% | -1.41% | ||
| QTWO - GRAB | 42% Loosely correlated | -1.33% | ||
| AVPT - GRAB | 41% Loosely correlated | -18.11% | ||
| NET - GRAB | 41% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| SHOP - GRAB | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.97% | ||
| CPAY - GRAB | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.92% | ||
More | ||||