Advertisement
EML vs GTES
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EML is a Buy and GTES is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EML’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGTES’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- EML’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- GTES’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EML’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GTES’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- EML’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
- GTES’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
EML (@Tools & Hardware) experienced а +0.84% price change this week, while GTES (@Industrial Machinery) price change was +1.45% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Tools & Hardware industry was +0.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.29%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was -0.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.25%.
Reported Earning Dates
EML is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.
GTES is expected to report earnings on Oct 31, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Tools & Hardware (+0.03% weekly)Tools & Hardware industry includes companies that manufacture security products, storage cabinets, steel rules and tapes, calipers, shoe hook fasteners, lumber, structural materials and other related supplies. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc., Snap-on Incorporated and L.S. Starrett Company are some of the largest, established players in this industry. The industry is also seeing rapid growth in online sales. The proliferation of do-it-yourself (DIY) projects has boosted industry demand. But oil price volatility poses potential risks to this industry, particularly to e-commerce companies which spend on services of shipping companies, which might alter charges based on oil price movements.
@Industrial Machinery (-0.43% weekly)The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.
| EML | GTES | EML / GTES | |
| Capitalization | 146M | 6.68B | 2% |
| EBITDA | 22M | 666M | 3% |
| Gain YTD | -8.519 | 26.057 | -33% |
| P/E Ratio | 13.39 | 33.24 | 40% |
| Revenue | 269M | 3.39B | 8% |
| Total Cash | 9.11M | 720M | 1% |
| Total Debt | 57.4M | 2.47B | 2% |
EML | GTES | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 7 | 30 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 30 Undervalued | 69 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 72 | 29 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 95 | 82 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 68 | 11 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
EML's Valuation (30) in the Industrial Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GTES (69) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that EML’s stock grew somewhat faster than GTES’s over the last 12 months.
GTES's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the Industrial Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EML (72) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that GTES’s stock grew somewhat faster than EML’s over the last 12 months.
GTES's SMR Rating (82) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as EML (95) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that GTES’s stock grew similarly to EML’s over the last 12 months.
GTES's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as EML (59) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that GTES’s stock grew similarly to EML’s over the last 12 months.
GTES's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Industrial Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for EML (68) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that GTES’s stock grew somewhat faster than EML’s over the last 12 months.
| EML | GTES | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 62% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 61% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 66% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 66% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 67% | 6 days ago 64% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 57% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 57% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BUFMX | 17.07 | 0.09 | +0.53% |
| Buffalo Mid Cap Growth | |||
| RGAEX | 85.10 | 0.20 | +0.24% |
| American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R4 | |||
| CECYX | 29.47 | N/A | N/A |
| Columbia Large Cap Enhanced Core Inst3 | |||
| ETCHX | 35.00 | N/A | N/A |
| Eventide Healthcare & Life Sciences C | |||
| FGTAX | 28.74 | -0.20 | -0.69% |
| Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock A | |||
EML and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EML has been loosely correlated with GTES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EML jumps, then GTES could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EML | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EML | 100% | -0.54% | ||
| GTES - EML | 38% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| RRX - EML | 36% Loosely correlated | -1.17% | ||
| NPO - EML | 36% Loosely correlated | +1.17% | ||
| NDSN - EML | 34% Loosely correlated | -0.43% | ||
| CMI - EML | 34% Loosely correlated | -0.27% | ||
More | ||||
GTES and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GTES has been closely correlated with DOV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GTES jumps, then DOV could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GTES | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTES | 100% | N/A | ||
| DOV - GTES | 79% Closely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| PH - GTES | 78% Closely correlated | +0.21% | ||
| EMR - GTES | 77% Closely correlated | -0.41% | ||
| ITT - GTES | 75% Closely correlated | -0.59% | ||
| PNR - GTES | 72% Closely correlated | +0.53% | ||
More | ||||