Advertisement
EMITF vs KLYG
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMITF is a Hold and KLYG is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
EMITF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKLYG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- EMITF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- KLYG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
EMITF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KLYG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- EMITF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
- KLYG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
EMITF (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while KLYG (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was +14.50% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.34%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was +2.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.70%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Financial Conglomerates (+0.31% weekly)Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.
@Medical/Nursing Services (+2.31% weekly)The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
| EMITF | KLYG | EMITF / KLYG | |
| Capitalization | 23.1M | 3.71M | 623% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.000 | -55.882 | -36% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | N/A | - |
EMITF | KLYG | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 37 | 3 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 16 Undervalued | 74 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 66 | 94 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 2 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | 95 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 7 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
EMITF's Valuation (16) in the Real Estate Development industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KLYG (74) in the null industry. This means that EMITF’s stock grew somewhat faster than KLYG’s over the last 12 months.
EMITF's Profit vs Risk Rating (66) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as KLYG (94) in the null industry. This means that EMITF’s stock grew similarly to KLYG’s over the last 12 months.
KLYG's SMR Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for EMITF (92) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that KLYG’s stock grew significantly faster than EMITF’s over the last 12 months.
EMITF's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Real Estate Development industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KLYG (95) in the null industry. This means that EMITF’s stock grew somewhat faster than KLYG’s over the last 12 months.
KLYG's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for EMITF (100) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that KLYG’s stock grew significantly faster than EMITF’s over the last 12 months.
| EMITF | KLYG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 41% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 44% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 27 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 81% |
Advertisement
EMITF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EMITF has been loosely correlated with STSS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EMITF jumps, then STSS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EMITF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMITF | 100% | N/A | ||
| STSS - EMITF | 38% Loosely correlated | -4.66% | ||
| AVHHL - EMITF | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GCTK - EMITF | 22% Poorly correlated | -3.07% | ||
| NUWE - EMITF | 22% Poorly correlated | -2.25% | ||
| EMBC - EMITF | 21% Poorly correlated | -2.07% | ||
More | ||||
KLYG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KLYG has been loosely correlated with OSSUY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KLYG jumps, then OSSUY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KLYG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KLYG | 100% | +14.50% | ||
| OSSUY - KLYG | 34% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| DXCM - KLYG | 22% Poorly correlated | -3.12% | ||
| EMITF - KLYG | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| POAI - KLYG | 21% Poorly correlated | +6.27% | ||
| MBGNF - KLYG | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||