28 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMIF vs PAC
EMIF vs PAC Comparison
Open Charts EMIF vs PAC
iShares Emerging Markets Infras ETF
Price$23.49
Change+$0.03 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.07M
Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacifico SAB de CV Amer Dep Shares (each rep 10 Ser B shares)
Price$230.96
Change+$3.76 (+1.65%)
Volume$100
Capitalization8.24B
EMIF vs PAC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMIF vs. PAC commentary
Jun 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMIF is a Hold and PAC is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PAC: Fundamental Ratings
PAC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 69 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 15 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 25 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 13 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EMIF | PAC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 61% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 14 days ago 60% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
EMIF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EMIF has been loosely correlated with EBR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EMIF jumps, then EBR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EMIF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMIF | 100% | N/A | ||
| EBR - EMIF | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.41% | ||
| PAC - EMIF | 54% Loosely correlated | +1.06% | ||
| ASR - EMIF | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.25% | ||
| SBS - EMIF | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| ELP - EMIF | 49% Loosely correlated | -1.33% | ||
More | ||||
PAC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAC has been closely correlated with ASR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAC jumps, then ASR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PAC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAC | 100% | +1.06% | ||
| ASR - PAC | 74% Closely correlated | -0.25% | ||
| OMAB - PAC | 73% Closely correlated | +2.45% | ||
| CAAP - PAC | 42% Loosely correlated | +1.10% | ||
| ASLE - PAC | 23% Poorly correlated | +1.00% | ||
| BLDE - PAC | 19% Poorly correlated | +2.74% | ||
More | ||||