44 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMIF vs PAC
EMIF vs PAC Comparison
Open Charts EMIF vs PAC
iShares Emerging Markets Infras ETF
Price$25.54
Change+$0.12 (+0.47%)
Volume$198
Net Assets7.63M
Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacifico SAB de CV Amer Dep Shares (each rep 10 Ser B shares)
Price$250.38
Change+$0.45 (+0.18%)
Volume$630
Capitalization12.63B
EMIF vs PAC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMIF vs. PAC commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMIF is a Hold and PAC is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PAC: Fundamental Ratings
PAC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 73 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 14 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 19 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 22 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EMIF | PAC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 61% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 74% | 14 days ago 60% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 50% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
EMIF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EMIF has been loosely correlated with PAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EMIF jumps, then PAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EMIF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMIF | 100% | +1.95% | ||
| PAC - EMIF | 54% Loosely correlated | +1.16% | ||
| ASR - EMIF | 52% Loosely correlated | +1.05% | ||
| SBS - EMIF | 52% Loosely correlated | +3.30% | ||
| ELP - EMIF | 49% Loosely correlated | +1.79% | ||
| OMAB - EMIF | 47% Loosely correlated | +2.17% | ||
More | ||||
PAC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAC has been closely correlated with OMAB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAC jumps, then OMAB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PAC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAC | 100% | +1.16% | ||
| OMAB - PAC | 71% Closely correlated | +2.17% | ||
| ASR - PAC | 68% Closely correlated | +1.05% | ||
| ASLE - PAC | 19% Poorly correlated | -0.70% | ||
| SRTA - PAC | 14% Poorly correlated | -2.87% | ||
| CAAP - PAC | 13% Poorly correlated | +1.90% | ||
More | ||||