4 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
EMIF vs PAC
EMIF vs PAC Comparison
Open Charts EMIF vs PAC
iShares Emerging Markets Infras ETF
Price$25.72
Change+$0.18 (+0.70%)
Volume$1.76K
Net Assets7.72M
Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacifico SAB de CV Amer Dep Shares (each rep 10 Ser B shares)
Price$222.22
Change+$0.02 (+0.01%)
Volume$106.21K
Capitalization11.23B
EMIF vs PAC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMIF vs. PAC commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMIF is a Hold and PAC is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PAC: Fundamental Ratings
PAC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 52 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 68 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 18 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 19 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 33 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| EMIF | PAC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 61% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 70% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 73% | 6 days ago 59% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 51% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
EMIF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EMIF has been loosely correlated with SBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EMIF jumps, then SBS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EMIF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMIF | 100% | +0.69% | ||
| SBS - EMIF | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.72% | ||
| ASR - EMIF | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.09% | ||
| PAC - EMIF | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.01% | ||
| ELP - EMIF | 51% Loosely correlated | +2.88% | ||
| OMAB - EMIF | 49% Loosely correlated | +1.73% | ||
More | ||||
PAC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAC has been closely correlated with ASR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAC jumps, then ASR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PAC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAC | 100% | +0.01% | ||
| ASR - PAC | 72% Closely correlated | +0.09% | ||
| OMAB - PAC | 71% Closely correlated | +1.73% | ||
| CAAP - PAC | 35% Loosely correlated | +1.52% | ||
| ASRMF - PAC | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.50% | ||
| GPAEF - PAC | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||